Quote:
Originally Posted by Toy Soldier
I get that, but where is the line? If it's only direct insults that's fine but then you have the problem of assumed insult e.g.
"I think that UKIP is essentially a xenophobic party and many UKIP members are racist."
"But I support UKIP so you are calling me a racist! Waaah!" *report*
Or
"I think that after the 2010 elections, believing a word of the Lib Dem manifesto would be incredibly naive... "
"I am voting Lib Dem how darest thee call me naive?? I have three degrees in astuteness! I'm going to report your face into the ****ing pavement you scum sucking waste of electoral roll space!"
... Well, you see my point. I might have gotten a little carried away there.
Maybe Niamh should just create her cage as a sticky thread at the top of the forum, and then as soon as threads start to kick off, the involved members get locked into that one thread until it's over? I reckon that would actually be possible with creative usergroup permissions, it could be hilarious  .
"Kirk! Kizzy! BANISHED to the cage, don't come out until it's over or one of you is dead." |
That's been discussed before actually, about having a kind of "argument thread" I can see the pros and cons but I think it'd just become a place where people would go to insult eachother and maybe even people who are not involved or don't want a non moderated section
Threaded Mode