[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by kirklancaster

To be fair though - a couple of us DO get too involved and the editing of the thread was no different to the way that similar threads had been 'cleansed' in the past, so I don't really understand the 'umbrage' at this one.

I have had long, detailed posts removed which were 99% relevant to the thread topic but transgressed on 1%, and I have had posts removed which left those I was debating with with the 'last word', and it's not a satisfying feeling when this happens, but hey, that's life. Best to move on and all learn from this.

You don't understand why I'm annoyed my thread was closed?
Seeing as your admittance that you and A N other member get too involved in them should address that.
Maybe it's what Ammi was referring to who knows.

[kirklancaster]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

You don't understand why I'm annoyed my thread was closed?
Seeing as your admittance that you and A N other member get too involved in them should address that.
Maybe it's what Ammi was referring to who knows.

Calm down woman, I didn't even address my post to you - I was making a comment in general reply.

The emboldened text is - undoubtedly - a thinly veiled skit at me for no reason - but I am now in that all too familiar situation where I cannot defend my stance or really respond to you without aggravating the situation.

But to be honest here - you yourself started to turn that thread nasty for no reason when I posted:

Quote:
Originally Posted by kirklancaster View Post

"Your response does NOT address the points in my post which you are responding to."

And I wrote the above because your response GENUINELY did not address it and you were just making irrelevant comments. However; you responded - quite nastily for no reason - with:

"I responded to the relevant element. If you don't understand my post I'm not sure how I can simplify it any more without pictures."

Which is personal, deliberately demeaning and insults my intelligence.

And because I have learnt from similar incidents when I HAVE got drawn in and ended up infracted and banned, and because I did not want the thread to descend into the usual chaotic verbal slugfest (which is the direction it was going anyway) I reported you.

Whether that is solely what caused the thread to be closed or whether it was simply a contributory factor I don't know, and I don't really care.

If the mods decision was to close the thread then that's the mods decision and we all have to accept it.

Sorry.

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by kirklancaster

Calm down woman, I didn't even address my post to you - I was making a comment in general reply.

The emboldened text is - undoubtedly - a thinly veiled skit at me for no reason - but I am now in that all too familiar situation where I cannot defend my stance or really respond to you without aggravating the situation.

But to be honest here - you yourself started to turn that thread nasty for no reason when I posted:

Quote:
Originally Posted by kirklancaster View Post

Your response does NOT address the points in my post which you are responding to.

Because it GENUINELY did not address it and you were just making irrelevant comments. However; you responded - quite nastily for no reason - with:

"I responded to the relevant element. If you don't understand my post I'm not sure how I can simplify it any more without pictures."

Which is personal, deliberately demeaning and insults my intelligence.

And because I have learnt from similar incidents when I HAVE got drawn in and ended up infracted and banned, and because I did not want the thread to descend into the usual chaotic verbal slugfest (which is the direction it was going anyway) I reported you.

Whether that is solely what caused the thread to be closed or whether it was simply a contributory factor I don't know, and I don't really care.

If the mods decision was to close the thread then that's the mods decision and we all have to accept it.

Sorry.

I didn't get past the 1st sentence of this sorry.
I won't be responding to any mocking posts.

[kirklancaster]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

I didn't get past the 1st sentence of this sorry.
I won't be responding to any mocking posts.

What 'mocking' post?????

Come on Kizzy - really? What mocking post? It's not a mocking post - it's a valid response to your invalid post to me, and it is explanatory in nature NOT mocking.

Oh - I just noticed that you have emboldened the first sentence; "Calm down woman" but if that's what you're taking umbrage at can I point out please, that you do need to calm down and you ARE a woman.

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by kirklancaster

What 'mocking' post?????

Come on Kizzy - really? What mocking post? It's not a mocking post - it's a valid response to your invalid post to me, and it is explanatory in nature NOT mocking.

you're like a forum poltergeist throwing accusations around, post your comments to me on that thread and remember your sunday school teachings, take the plank out of your own eye kirk.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

you're like a forum poltergeist throwing accusations around, post your comments to me on that thread and remember your sunday school teachings, take the plank out of your own eye kirk.

are you calling Kirk a planker?

[Kyle]

Nobody puts Kizzy in a corner.

[kirklancaster]

Originally Posted by Kyle

Nobody puts Kizzy in a corner.

Not without a chair in one hand, a whip in the other, and a 'Head Keeper's' peaked cap on.