Home Menu

Site Navigation


General Chat General discussion. Want to chat about anything not covered in another forum - This is the place!

Register to reply Log in to reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 21-05-2015, 12:29 PM #17
user104658 user104658 is offline
-
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 36,685
user104658 user104658 is offline
-
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 36,685
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Niamh. View Post
I disagree with that, refusing to put a slogan supporting a terrorist group is not discrimination against terrorist groups, since they're .....a terrorist group lol in fact the person asking for that message should probably be reported and questioned about their links to that terrorist group
It's not about whether or not it's discrimination though, and I'm not saying they shouldn't lose business, just that the consequences should be "natural" - i.e. Tell everyone how small minded and prejudiced they are and they will lose business, one would hope.

All I'm saying is that you can't legislate prejudice out of existence. If it was illegal for them to refuse to make the gay wedding cake, sure, they would make the cake, but would they be any less prejudiced? Would you WANT your cake to be made by people who are against something so fundamental about you, just because the law says they "have to"? It's just a mess.

Also, how is it feasible? You can't make legislation that says a business has go accept every single job. What if a cake shop has a load of other wedding booked for the same week and simply has to turn someone away? That has to be an option. You can't tell a private business that they must accept every contract that comes their way, it's just not feasible. And so, all you will end up with is people still turning away business for prejudiced reasons but just not being honest about them, and just saying that they aren't available at that time / can't do it for some other reason.

Better that people know their ****ty reasons in my opinion, so that they can then commit to NEVER using them.
user104658 is offline  
Register to reply Log in to reply

Bookmark/share this topic

Tags
axed, loose, women


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:26 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

"Big Brother and UK Television Forum. Est. 2001"

 

© 2023
no new posts