[Withano]

Originally Posted by Griffin5779

where i come from you are innocent till proven guilty

And the tweet alone is proof for everybody but a few it seems.

[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by Withano

And the tweet alone is proof for everybody but a few it seems.

No it isn't,we don't know what was said to get that reaction

[Ramsay]

Originally Posted by Kazanne

No it isn't,we don't know what was said to get that reaction

for god sake, there was clear racism in the second tweet...what was said before doesn't matter.

[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by Ramsay

for god sake, there was clear racism in the second tweet...what was said before doesn't matter.

Ok stop getting you knickers in a twist,didn't even see that one,Christ!!!

[Withano]

Originally Posted by Kazanne

No it isn't,we don't know what was said to get that reaction

He physically typed out the words and chose to press send. It is inexcusable in every context, if you're saying the guy on the other side could have been just as terrible then fair. But you're not saying that, you're saying Marc may be forgiven giving a very specific context and that is not okay. They are either both disgusting or Marc alone was disgusting, there is proof for the latter.

[Griffin5779]

Originally Posted by Withano

And the tweet alone is proof for everybody but a few it seems.

you said " But yes, if he said it to a friend I would concede and agree that it did not have a nasty intent but until this is proven, I refuse to believe that this was "banter" in any shape or form.. And so should you

so you said yourself the facts haven't been proven

[Withano]

Originally Posted by Griffin5779

you said " But yes, if he said it to a friend I would concede and agree that it did not have a nasty intent but until this is proven, I refuse to believe that this was "banter" in any shape or form.. And so should you

so you said yourself the facts haven't been proven

I'm sorry, I don't understand what you misunderstood

[Griffin5779]

Originally Posted by Withano

I'm sorry, I don't understand what you misunderstood

it sounds to me that in the tweet you concede it hasn't been proven..and in the second say the tweet is proof enough..that seems a contradiction to me..

but my 28 year old friend here so you are on your own..i'm going to share some banter

[Withano]

Originally Posted by Griffin5779

it sounds to me that in the tweet you concede it hasn't been proven..and in the second say the tweet is proof enough..that seems a contradiction to me..

but my 28 year old friend here so you are on your own..i'm going to share some banter

Okay. No, sorry, i understand. I meant that if there was proof that a near 30 year old Marc was good friends with this teen looking boy, I would agree that it would probably lack a malicious intent. But my point was that this will never be the case. Marc sent the tweet to the stranger to be as cruel as he possibly could in 140 characters.