[Griffin5779]

Originally Posted by Withano

And the tweet alone is proof for everybody but a few it seems.

you said " But yes, if he said it to a friend I would concede and agree that it did not have a nasty intent but until this is proven, I refuse to believe that this was "banter" in any shape or form.. And so should you

so you said yourself the facts haven't been proven

[Withano]

Originally Posted by Griffin5779

you said " But yes, if he said it to a friend I would concede and agree that it did not have a nasty intent but until this is proven, I refuse to believe that this was "banter" in any shape or form.. And so should you

so you said yourself the facts haven't been proven

I'm sorry, I don't understand what you misunderstood

[Griffin5779]

Originally Posted by Withano

I'm sorry, I don't understand what you misunderstood

it sounds to me that in the tweet you concede it hasn't been proven..and in the second say the tweet is proof enough..that seems a contradiction to me..

but my 28 year old friend here so you are on your own..i'm going to share some banter

[Withano]

Originally Posted by Griffin5779

it sounds to me that in the tweet you concede it hasn't been proven..and in the second say the tweet is proof enough..that seems a contradiction to me..

but my 28 year old friend here so you are on your own..i'm going to share some banter

Okay. No, sorry, i understand. I meant that if there was proof that a near 30 year old Marc was good friends with this teen looking boy, I would agree that it would probably lack a malicious intent. But my point was that this will never be the case. Marc sent the tweet to the stranger to be as cruel as he possibly could in 140 characters.