[Nedusa]

He said her picture was stunning he was paying her a compliment,nothing sexually suggestive or offensive in that.

She completely overreacted and punished this guy publicly...why ??

She is the one with the problem , man hating bitch so far up her own arse...

[arista]

Originally Posted by Nedusa

He said her picture was stunning he was paying her a compliment,nothing sexually suggestive or offensive in that.

She completely overreacted and punished this guy publicly...why ??

She is the one with the problem , man hating bitch so far up her own arse...

Bad Times with men

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Nedusa

He said her picture was stunning he was paying her a compliment,nothing sexually suggestive or offensive in that.

She completely overreacted and punished this guy publicly...why ??

She is the one with the problem , man hating bitch so far up her own arse...

Because quite possibly as it is a professional site she wasn't to happy that he overlooked all her academic and work achievements and focused on her looks? as an introductory email on that particular site it was insulting, maybe he got the site confused with match.com

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Cherie

Because quite possibly as it is a professional site she wasn't to happy that he overlooked all her academic and work achievements and focused on her looks? as an introductory email on that particular site it was insulting, maybe he got the site confused with match.com

I agree with that, not because I think it's a problem that he complimented her picture, but because that's ALL he did. If he had messaged her in the spirit of what the site is supposed to be about, to make that sort of contact, written a big message focusing on her professional expertise and with a good reason that they should be contacts, and then he had added at the bottom "Oh, by the way, great profile picture!"... Then I don't see why it should be a problem.

However, the fact that he quite clearly had no interest in messaging her other than to creep, is what makes it a problem. It's not Tinder.

[Nedusa]

Originally Posted by Cherie

Because quite possibly as it is a professional site she wasn't to happy that he overlooked all her academic and work achievements and focused on her looks? as an introductory email on that particular site it was insulting, maybe he got the site confused with match.com

Disagree.....Linkedin is still a social media website and as such there is room for a certain amount of informality. what he said was complimentary NOT sexist . she has taken a friendly remark and decided to attack this man publicly, label him a sexist a pervert etc..

This is an outrageous attack on this man's character over a friendly innocuous remark.

NOT many Solicitors will want to deal with this slightly deranged feminist after her strange reaction to this man's remark.

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by Nedusa

Disagree.....Linkedin is still a social media website and as such there is room for a certain amount of informality. what he said was complimentary NOT sexist . she has taken a friendly remark and decided to attack this man publicly, label him a sexist a pervert etc..

This is an outrageous attack on this man's character over a friendly innocuous remark.

NOT many Solicitors will want to deal with this slightly deranged feminist after her strange reaction to this man's remark.

Apparently it wasn't even based on her looks at all...

'He’s now delivered a statement on the subject, saying he meant the quality of her photo was ‘stunning’ rather than Proudman herself.
“My comment was aimed at the professional quality of the presentation on LinkedIn which was unfortunately misinterpreted,” he said.'

And if you believe that..

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/wom...rent-this.html

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

Apparently it wasn't even based on her looks at all...

'He’s now delivered a statement on the subject, saying he meant the quality of her photo was ‘stunning’ rather than Proudman herself.
“My comment was aimed at the professional quality of the presentation on LinkedIn which was unfortunately misinterpreted,” he said.'

And if you believe that..

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/wom...rent-this.html

yeah right If that was true why did he say that he was being Politically incorrect? Idiot lol

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

yeah right If that was true why did he say that he was being Politically incorrect? Idiot lol

Autocorrect. He actually meant to type "Photographically Current", as he was admiring the fact that she had clearly made use of the latest technology.

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

Autocorrect. He actually meant to type "Photographically Current", as he was admiring the fact that she had clearly made use of the latest technology.

Oh I see, makes perfect sense