Home Menu

Site Navigation


Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics.

Register to reply Log in to reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 03-01-2016, 04:14 PM #9
chuff me dizzy chuff me dizzy is offline
User banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 44,726

Favourites (more):
BB13: Luke A
BB12: Harry


chuff me dizzy chuff me dizzy is offline
User banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 44,726

Favourites (more):
BB13: Luke A
BB12: Harry


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toy Soldier View Post
Wow. A whole thread dedicated to lumping people into categories. Gay, Straight, Catholic, Protestant, English, Northern Irish, Southern Irish... will there ever be a day when these things become tiny aspects of how people define themselves and others as individuals? It drives me nuts on both sides. Can't stand it when people judge others based on their sexuality. But I equally can't stand it when people define themselves by their own sexuality (or gender, or race, or country of origin). This should NOT be the over-riding component of who you are as a free-thinking human being, and it seems to be for far too many.

I personally don't have time for any of it, it's ridiculous. There are, and should be, individuals, and humans, and that's it. Further subcategories are unnecessary and problematic.

So yeah... I don't have time for anyone who can't "accept" homosexuality (or anything else) because they were "raised that way" or are "from another generation" - unless they are simpletons, they can sit down and actually think about the issue for themselves rationally and logically. If they come to the (obvious) conclusion that it is perfectly fine, and also none of their business what anyone else does so long as it isn't harming others then they are a good and reasonable person. If they come to the conclusion that it is somehow "wrong" then they are piece of ****.

But let me also add, I also have very little time for individuals who happen to be homosexual whining that they are the only ones (along with ethnic minorities, apparently) who can face discrimination or hardship. Heterophobia exists. It is far less serious than homophobia. This does not mean it can't exist. It's reactionary and emotionally driven nonsense to suggest that this is the case.

"OW I've cut my finger!"
"Errrr no me and several other people in the world have suffered the loss of a limb. You can't begin to understand that. Cuts on the finger simply do not exist."

Derp. No.

There is absolutely no inherent suggestion of equivalence in pointing out that the the term heterophobia exists. The suggestion of equivalence pretty much always comes from those who adamantly state that it doesn't exist, and in a reactionary fashion. It is, again, unnecessary.
So only straight people put people in catergories? What a load of utter rubbish
chuff me dizzy is offline  
Register to reply Log in to reply

Bookmark/share this topic

Tags
heterophobia


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:16 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

"Big Brother and UK Television Forum. Est. 2001"

 

© 2023
no new posts