[jet]

Originally Posted by ThriceShy

It is clear what he means by abuse. He isn't saying that gay people will physically or sexually abuse the child. He is saying that psychologically it isn't healthy to deliberately start a child off in life without a mother.

He has perhaps chosen unwise words but his opinion is not unreasonable and it is shared by lots of people.

But he didn't say that, you can't speak for him.

[sampvt]

Originally Posted by jet

But he didn't say that, you can't speak for him.

By the same token what gives you the right to speak against him for something you obviously either don't want to understand or simply don't understand. Don't be too hasty to condemn something that is obviously above you. Debate it instead and learn the bones of the views instead of standing in judgement as the only voice of reason.

[jet]

[QUOTE=sampvt;8409417]By the same token what gives you the right to speak against him for something you obviously either don't want to understand or simply don't understand. Don't be too hasty to condemn something that is obviously above you. Debate it instead and learn the bones of the views instead of standing in judgement as the only voice of reason.[/QUOT

This forum gives me the right to speak, it is what it is for.
What is it I am supposed to not understand or what is supposed to be above me. You talk in riddles. Debate the issues that arise about the HM in question instead of making sweeping and confusing statements about the poster.