Quote:
Originally Posted by MrWong
They should expect to be challenged on them.
They can try and justify them if they like, I don't care as the justifications are usually a load of waffle anyway and have no basis in fact.
|
Why should they expect to be challenged on them? Are you saying those views are less valid than opposing views?
Why shouldn't someone who agrees with gay adoption expect to be challenged on their views?
And I return to the question I asked yesterday. Why wasn't Jim Davidson expected to be challenged on his view that Brian Dowling is a "shirtlifter" and a "puff"? Do we only challenge people we don't like?
Angie Bowie,
Threaded Mode