Quote:
Originally Posted by MrWong
Nope. Try reading again.
It's called debate. Ever changed your opinion on something when hearing different sides? Hardly shocking behaviour.
How the **** should I know? Ask the producers. I hated Jim.
|
You are deliberately avoiding my point, as usual.
You claim that someone like Winston should be challenged on his views. Why? Why is his view less worthy than say John's? Should John be challenged on his?
Let us suppose that Winston had simply said, as I advised, "It's my opinion, I don't wish to discuss it, the end." Would that be OK?
Is Winstons opinion as valid as John's? If not, why not?