[Livia]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

You are, yes.

I know.

You will stick rigidly to your opinion, crack "jokes" etc. in an effort to mask the fact that you cancel out one of your opinions with another. It's amusing.... but a time waster.

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Livia

I know.

You will stick rigidly to your opinion, crack "jokes" etc. in an effort to mask the fact that you cancel out one of your opinions with another. It's amusing.... but a time waster.

I think I explained quite clearly why that is not the case; the fact that you don't understand (perhaps by inability, though I suspect by choice) isn't really of any concern to me.

[Livia]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

I think I explained quite clearly why that is not the case; the fact that you don't understand (perhaps by inability, though I suspect by choice) isn't really of any concern to me.

You write something I can't comprehend. How likely do you think that is?

Maybe you're not quite grasping my meaning?

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Livia

You write something I can't comprehend. How likely do you think that is?

100% likely, on account that it has happened on this thread. Although as I said, I suspect the "misunderstanding" is probably by choice and you are in fact well aware that there is no contradiction.

[Livia]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

100% likely, on account that it has happened on this thread. Although as I said, I suspect the "misunderstanding" is probably by choice and you are in fact well aware that there is no contradiction.

Your default argument is always : maybe you're too stupid to understand me [I'm paraphrasing].

Again... not very likely, is it.

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Livia

Your default argument is always : maybe you're too stupid to understand me [I'm paraphrasing].

Again... not very likely, is it.

I know perfectly well that you're not "too stupid to understand me" Livia which is why - again - I will point out that my argument here is in fact not this supposed "default" argument.

My argument is that you know fine well that there is no contradiction (im drawing a parallel between some of Trump's political tactics and pre-WWII Germany, and my issue with terrorist-psychology being brushed off as "just monsters") but you are for some reason trying to create a supposed logical contradiction to further your own argument.

There is no logical contradiction. The two issues are entirely unrelated.

[Rob!]

He's also said that the only reason he isn't tackling gay marriage as well is because he'd be "fighting a losing battle."

Also they both had stupid hair.