[LukeB]

Originally Posted by Lostie!

Not all. As I said, there are nomination votes. Gordon choosing who goes is just another difference in how they leave. That's my point, just saying "they nominate and get evicted but just in a different way" doesn't mean anything really.



A comment that insulted a whole group of people for how they make a living, people exaggerate how unfair the reaction to that was.

And I'm not sure of what point you're making. Are you saying the US format is immune to unjust evictions? Because I'd beg to differ there.



Yes, BBUK is crap right now. They should fix that and return it to what people loved about it in the first place, I don't see the need to change it even more.

And they get information from the outside in BBUS too.

But we're not going to agree so we'll just have to wait and see.

1.I've seen Gordan change things around and Hells Kitchen is not an social experiment which Big Brother is. So as I said it's a different type of show.

2.Clearly she didn't mean any harm and it's still not a reason to be evicted.. If someone was having a bad day and they called someone a **** they would get nominated and evicted over someone like Pav who offers nothing and is a pathetic excuse of a housemate. BB15.. Toya was evicted over Marlon and Ash because of her edit that week. Toya was a better housemate than those bores who did nothing but suck Helen's bum hole.

3. The don't get outside info much compared to BBUK which is against what they show is all about like celebs vs civilian is against what Cilvs bb is all about so theres' 0 point of having that format when we already have cbb in the winter and summer.

[Lostie!]

Originally Posted by LukeB

1.I've seen Gordan change things around and Hells Kitchen is not an social experiment which Big Brother is. So as I said it's a different type of show.

You're missing my point that simply having nominations and eliminations as part of the basic format (the two elements you cited as reasons for BBUS staying true to the general format of Big Brother, which is the whole reason I made this comparison) doesn't really mean anything, but anyway we're going round in circles now.

Originally Posted by LukeB

2.Clearly she didn't mean any harm and it's still not a reason to be evicted.. If someone was having a bad day and they called someone a **** they would get nominated and evicted over someone like Pav who offers nothing and is a pathetic excuse of a housemate. BB15.. Toya was evicted over Marlon and Ash because of her edit that week. Toya was a better housemate than those bores who did nothing but suck Helen's bum hole.

Not really for you to say though. There would have been plenty of people who work hard to make ends meet who would have been understandably offended by what Zoe said. It's no one else's fault she decided to unfairly stereotype a whole category of people.

And you haven't responded to my question about BBUS' evictions. Can you really say you think most of them have been completely deserved?

Originally Posted by LukeB

3. The don't get outside info much compared to BBUK which is against what they show is all about like celebs vs civilian is against what Cilvs bb is all about so theres' 0 point of having that format when we already have cbb in the winter and summer.

But they get it, which is my point. Like Kathy Griffin going in during BB16 and basically just reeling off her opinions to them all.

And yes, I agree there's no point in combining CBB with civilian BB when we already have a separate currently airing show for that. A bit like the argument for not adopting the BBUS format.

[LukeB]

Originally Posted by Lostie!

Not really for you to say though. There would have been plenty of people who work hard to make ends meet who would have been understandably offended by what Zoe said. It's no one else's fault she decided to unfairly stereotype a whole category of people.

And you haven't responded to my question about BBUS' evictions. Can you really say you think most of them have been completely deserved?

What do you mean by deserved since personal issues are not the reason why they are evicted? Aaryn Gries was a racist but she got evicted because she is a comp threat and an actual threat for their game. So if it helped their game then yes each eviction was deserved.

Originally Posted by Lostie!

But they get it, which is my point. Like Kathy Griffin going in during BB16 and basically just reeling off her opinions to them all.

And yes, I agree there's no point in combining CBB with civilian BB when we already have a separate currently airing show for that. A bit like the argument for not adopting the BBUS format

Was it really her opinion though? she went in to slate everyone trying to be funny because they had to do a comp to fix Zingbot who was being nice when he normally says negative things about each and one of them which is what Kathy did