Quote:
Originally Posted by Hayden
By that logic if you think Chloe didn't deserve to win then Andrew doesn't deserve to win either?
|
What logic ?...Chloe's crime was actual and directiy targeted a real life victim...it was also confirmed by her police record...Andrews accused of childish and bigotted tweets with a friend...most importantly it's not been proved and he's not had chance to defend himself....Chloe was proved and she had chance to defend herself but instead tried to ruin a guys life to cover her tracks ....
Innocent till proven guilty ....not guilty till proven innocent ....she was proven to be guilty he hasn't been