[Yaki da]

Originally Posted by Bb2014

It's a head to head (which is great btw) because James & Grant got so much votes compared to Bear

The previous rules have been anyone with 2 up. Most likely Ricky, Grant or the Mob Wives woman would have been in most danger.

It's got nothing to do with how many votes Grant and James got. It's do with them being ready to lose certain housemates but not others.

Stop making excuses for what is a blatant attempt to get certain people out over others.

[Maxxie.]

Originally Posted by Yaki da

The previous rules have been anyone with 2 up. Most likely Ricky, Grant or the Mob Wives woman would have been in most danger.

It's got nothing to do with how many votes Grant and James got. It's do with them being ready to lose certain housemates but not others.

Stop making excuses for what is a blatant attempt to get certain people out over others.

But Bear wouldn't have even gone if he was up?? He's about 4th favourite to win while James & Grant have the two lowest odds. The only benefit of having Bear up would be c5 would have made more money so I respect them for not doing that.

[Yaki da]

Originally Posted by Bb2014

But Bear wouldn't have even gone if he was up??

Who said he would have? The point is they are changing the rules to get rid of certain people rather risk losing others. Maybe they wanted Renee or Ricky to stay in and Grant to definitely go. or just they just don't care if it's Grant or James.

He's about 4th favourite to win while James & Grant have the two lowest odds. The only benefit of having Bear up would be c5 would have made more money so I respect them for not doing that.

The rules were anyone with 2 noms. Renee, Ricky and Marnie would have been up as well based on that.

No one is saying they did it to save Bear. But they did do it to make sure it was most likely to be Grant or James.

[Mullens123]

Originally Posted by Yaki da

The rules were anyone with 2 noms. Renee, Ricky and Marnie would have been up as well based on that.

No one is saying they did it to save Bear. But they did do it to make sure it was most likely to be Grant or James.

That isn't the "rules", it was one of MANY nomination rules used. The fact is since Power Trip only 3 seasons have had a consistent nomination rule, and only one of those used the anyone with 2 Noms rule. The fact people on facebook are saying "the rule was 4 or more with most Noms go up" or "the rule is anyone with a nomination going up" shows the mess this whole show is in. The fact is there is NO rule and there hasn't been one since 2013.

[Yaki da]

Originally Posted by Mullens123

That isn't the "rules", it was one of MANY nomination rules used.

One of many. LOL at you. They have a whole set of rules (in other words no rules) and then wait to see what the results are and then go with the one that allows them the best chance to get rid of who they want. In other words, they are rigging their own show.

The fact is since Power Trip only 3 seasons have had a consistent nomination rule, and only one of those used the anyone with 2 Noms rule.

The most frequently used over the last 3 years has been anyone with 2 is up.

The fact people on facebook are saying "the rule was 4 or more with most Noms go up" or "the rule is anyone with a nomination going up" shows the mess this whole show is in. The fact is there is NO rule and there hasn't been one since 2013.

We all know the show is a ****ing mess. All I am asking for is for them to have a set nominations procedure that doesn't allow them to rig the show the way they do. Unfortunately a lot of people seem to cheer the producers on when they blatantly rig the show year after year. Is it any wonder the show is in such a mess?