[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

You really have taken me up wrongly Kizzy if you think that any of my posts were aimed at you specifically because they really weren't

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet View Post
with ref to Kizzy and her assertion that the far right are taking over SD below are the last 5 pages of threads and who made them.

Arista: 56
Maru: 15
Northern MOnkey: 12
Hog: 13
LibertyforEva: 12
Cherie: 8
Kirk: 8
The Truth: 8
LT: 7
Johnny: 6
Kizzy: 6


My advice to the others (not you neem) who moan about SD

Make some threads
Yeah, this is good advice, I agree



No idea how I came to that conclusion .....my mistake then obv.

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet View Post
with ref to Kizzy and her assertion that the far right are taking over SD below are the last 5 pages of threads and who made them.

Arista: 56
Maru: 15
Northern MOnkey: 12
Hog: 13
LibertyforEva: 12
Cherie: 8
Kirk: 8
The Truth: 8
LT: 7
Johnny: 6
Kizzy: 6


My advice to the others (not you neem) who moan about SD

Make some threads
Yeah, this is good advice, I agree



No idea how I came to that conclusion .....my mistake then obv.

I was agreeing with the BIB, that people should make more threads, I said something similar myself yesterday although I see why you thought what you did, my apologies

[kirklancaster]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet View Post
with ref to Kizzy and her assertion that the far right are taking over SD below are the last 5 pages of threads and who made them.

Arista: 56
Maru: 15
Northern MOnkey: 12
Hog: 13
LibertyforEva: 12
Cherie: 8
Kirk: 8
The Truth: 8
LT: 7
Johnny: 6
Kizzy: 6


My advice to the others (not you neem) who moan about SD

Make some threads
Yeah, this is good advice, I agree



No idea how I came to that conclusion .....my mistake then obv.

This is NOT confrontational or baiting, but a simple question to you - and Niamh - because I just do not get it;

How did you educe from that quoted post of Niamh's that she was specifically referring to you???

I just do not see it at all.

Yes - I get that LT wrote: "with ref to Kizzy and her assertion that the far right are taking over SD" as a HEADER, but Niamh posted her comment DIRECTLY beneath LT's comment of: "Make some more threads", which means that THIS is the comment to which she was agreeing - in my opinion.

Make some threads
Yeah, this is good advice, I agree

Further reason to believe that Niamh was NOT referring to ANYONE in particular, is the fact that directly ABOVE his comment of 'make some more threads' LT also wrote:

"My advice to the others (not you neem) who moan about SD"

The above COULD NOT BE more clearly addressed to 'others' in general.

So:

It would seem logical to me that when someone comments "Yes I agree with this" DIRECTLY beneath text which says: "My advice to others who moan about SD is to make some more threads" - they are referring to that statement and not any other statements far above it.

In my opinion anyway.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by kirklancaster

This is NOT confrontational or baiting, but a simple question to you - and Niamh - because I just do not get it;

How did you educe from that quoted post of Niamh's that she was specifically referring to you???

I just do not see it at all.

Yes - I get that LT wrote: "with ref to Kizzy and her assertion that the far right are taking over SD" as a HEADER, but Niamh posted her comment DIRECTLY beneath LT's comment of: "Make some more threads", which means that THIS is the comment to which she was agreeing - in my opinion.

Make some threads
Yeah, this is good advice, I agree

Further reason to believe that Niamh was NOT referring to ANYONE in particular is that directly ABOVE his comment of 'make some more threads' LT also wSwas rote:

"My advice to the others (not you neem) who moan about SD"

So:

It would seem logical to me that when someone comments "Yes I agree with this" DIRECTLY beneath text which says: "My advice to others who moan about SD is to make some more threads" - they are referring to that statement and not any other statements far above it.

In my opinion anyway.

Only you Kirk, only you

[kirklancaster]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

Only you Kirk, only you

Thank you LT.

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by kirklancaster

This is NOT confrontational or baiting, but a simple question to you - and Niamh - because I just do not get it;

How did you educe from that quoted post of Niamh's that she was specifically referring to you???

I just do not see it at all.

Yes - I get that LT wrote: "with ref to Kizzy and her assertion that the far right are taking over SD" as a HEADER, but Niamh posted her comment DIRECTLY beneath LT's comment of: "Make some more threads", which means that THIS is the comment to which she was agreeing - in my opinion.

Make some threads
Yeah, this is good advice, I agree

Further reason to believe that Niamh was NOT referring to ANYONE in particular, is the fact that directly ABOVE his comment of 'make some more threads' LT also wrote:

"My advice to the others (not you neem) who moan about SD"

The above COULD NOT BE more clearly addressed to 'others' in general.

So:

It would seem logical to me that when someone comments "Yes I agree with this" DIRECTLY beneath text which says: "My advice to others who moan about SD is to make some more threads" - they are referring to that statement and not any other statements far above it.

In my opinion anyway.

Yep opinions are like arseholes, we all have one. That was mine, if you don't agree I don't particularly care but I appreciate your right to your view.

[kirklancaster]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

Yep opinions are like arseholes, we all have one. That was mine, if you don't agree I don't particularly care but I appreciate your right to your view.

Who cares whether you care or not? And NO I don't agree with your opinion but I appreciate your right to it. .