[Tom4784]

The Mail being a backwards pile of disgusting wank is nothing new.

They obviously don't believe that someone who isn't a Muslim can be a terrorist because it 'muddles' the narrative they prefer to **** out. It obviously believes it's target audience is more comfortable being scared of Arabs then it is of white people who aren't teenagers and/or single mothers.

The fact that they went as far as to attempt to defend him is crazy. To ignore the fact that other kinds of extremism exists is also beyond ridiculous. The man is a terrorist and should be treated as such. The fact is that the DM's coverage would have been way different if the terrorist wasn't white.

[Cherry Christmas]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

The Mail being a backwards pile of disgusting wank is nothing new.

They obviously don't believe that someone who isn't a Muslim can be a terrorist because it 'muddles' the narrative they prefer to **** out. It obviously believes it's target audience is more comfortable being scared of Arabs then it is of white people who aren't teenagers and/or single mothers.

The fact that they went as far as to attempt to defend him is crazy. To ignore the fact that other kinds of extremism exists is also beyond ridiculous. The man is a terrorist and should be treated as such. The fact is that the DM's coverage would have been way different if the terrorist wasn't white.

The Mail has no issue in casting every Irish person as a terrorist back in the day, Muslims are the new Irish in Britain, it sells newspapers, it's not about skin colour