[Livia]

Originally Posted by Withano

. I used the term snowflake in retaliation to something a lot worse.. Pretty similar to what you've done here, are you a fan of irony? Put me on that extensive ignore list if you dont like me behaving this way.. But umm.. Youve kind of done the same.

I have tried with you Withano because I quite like you. Usually I'd just put someone on ignore without trying to smooth the waters I don't always agree with you but you do make good points and you are passionate about your opinions and that's not a bad thing. But this is a debate forum. It's not a playground and it's not a war zone.

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Livia

If we were all in a room rather than online it would be so different.

bom-chikka-wah-waaah

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Livia

Mmmmm I could eat some of those right now.



Haven't seen it... I looked it up on Urban Dictionary. I'm so square.

You haven't seen Fight Club? Ohh you're missing out, watch it!

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Alf

I heard the term 'Snowflake' comes from the film 'Fight club', is that true?

"You are not special. You are not a beautiful and unique snowflake. You're the same decaying organic matter as everything else. We're all part of the same compost heap. We're the all singing, all dancing crap of the world."

I don't think it was the first place the term "snowflake" was used, though.

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by the truth

lol you know nothing about me or whether Ive experienced prejudice lol so ignorant of you to presume such a thing and of course your presumption is itself prejudicial

The fact that you think that Straight White Men are victimised more than any minority tells me all I need to know.

You're definitely white because if you were any other race then you wouldn't have said that since you'd have likely had to deal with racism at some point in your life and would know the difference between being a victim of racism and desperately wanting to be one.

You're definitely straight because no LGBT person would believe that straight people are victimised more than the LGBT. Like I mentioned above, you only really find those kinds of victim complexes within the majority, not a minority.

You're definitely a man because your attitude towards women is pretty textbook misogyny.

What I said before still stands, you have never faced any kind of prejudice based on your race, sexuality or gender so it's beyond ridiculous to hear you bleat on about imaginary things that enforce your victim complex.

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by Jessica.

Did anyone even read the first post? Abortion hasn't been banned at all, just support for people going through it. People are gonna do it anyway but many will be alone and unsupported through the process.

It's definitely a first salvo, women's rights are going to take a beating under Trump's regime.

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by Livia

Why don't you just debate your opinion and stop calling people silly names.

@LT.

[Pete.]

Republicans have a shocking policy on abortion and need get some perspective. What will happen when one of these health groups can't support a woman through an ectopic pregnancy?

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

It's definitely a first salvo, women's rights are going to take a beating under Trump's regime.

Here we go withe the crystal ball routine

[Greg!]

Originally Posted by Alf

Well that hasn't happened, so what are you fussing about?

Women can have abortions, but if they want them, then they can pay for them themselves. They're getting to be responsible for themselves.

Why should a tax-payer, who has no children, and get's no financial help for having no children, have to pay for other peoples mistakes?

Um because many women get pregnant through no fault of their own (raped, contraception fails etc) and many women who can't afford proper medical abortions, or are banned from doing so, attempt it themselves which can be extremely dangerous and damaging to their health?

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

Here we go withe the crystal ball routine

If you've got something useful to add then by all means go ahead.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by the truth

lets hope it allows more innocent harmless healthy babies the chance to live their lives

Yes, let's have more dysfunctional families on this overpopulated planet struggling to get by and being raised by parents who knew themselves they weren't capable of being parents but were forced into the decision to become one.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Pete.

Republicans have a shocking policy on abortion and need get some perspective. What will happen when one of these health groups can't support a woman through an ectopic pregnancy?

An ectopic pregnancy isn't an abortion?

[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

If you've got something useful to add then by all means go ahead.

Kind of you to give your permission!

[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by Withano

Meh, it was in response to being told I was being personally abusive in a thread that I made one post I'm sure I'm less fine with this complete lie than the other member is with being called snowflake. I'm sure its less of your concern than you like to think it is too.

Also, the background youve missed is that the original member popularised the term
But you seem comfortable enough on that high horse, so we'll move on.

From one high horse to another.

[arista]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

For their husbands is it, while they make the dinner and iron his shirts? aaahhh it's clear now Arista

No Fine Lady
not all of them
Some women also go out to work
as their kids are stuck in school.


Can you help Dezzy
to Understand Trump Won
because of Jobs that Clinton said NO to.


Also Fine Lady
http://www.thisisbigbrother.com/foru...d.php?t=315520
can you post on this thread, if you find time,
as I went out of my way
to back this other Fine Lady on
something now in Parliament
and New Law


Thank You For Your Time

[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by arista

No Fine Lady
not all of them
Some women also go out to work
as their kids are stuck in school.


Can you help Dezzy
to Understand Trump Won
because of Jobs that Clinton said NO to.


Also Fine Lady
http://www.thisisbigbrother.com/foru...d.php?t=315520
can you post on this thread, if you find time,
as I went out of my way
to back this other Fine Lady on
something now in Parliament
and New Law


Thank You For Your Time

Yes Arista one of the reasons many voted for Trump was because of jobs in industry, so it is a promise he had better keep or there will be a mass turn around at the next election, but unfortunately some can't see much further than the 'isms' on this subject. It's all about agenda.

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Brillopad

Yes Arista one of the reasons many voted for Trump was because of jobs in industry, so it is a promise he had better keep or there will be a mass turn around at the next election, but unfortunately some can't see much further than the 'isms' on this subject. It's all about agenda.

There will be a mass turnaround anyway. Half the reason Trump won was voter apathy, they got a 55% turnout which is really shameful for the world's supposed "beacon of democracy". And less than half of those who voted voted for Trump.

If anything positive will come from this, I would hope it's that a lot of people will have been shocked out of their stupor and actually bother to vote in 2020.

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

There will be a mass turnaround anyway. Half the reason Trump won was voter apathy, they got a 55% turnout which is really shameful for the world's supposed "beacon of democracy". And less than half of those who voted voted for Trump.

If anything positive will come from this, I would hope it's that a lot of people will have been shocked out of their stupor and actually bother to vote in 2020.

I was over in the states just before the election and spoke to alot of people about it, the vast majority felt like they were stuck between a rock and a hard place because they hated both candidates

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

I was over in the states just before the election and spoke to alot of people about it, the vast majority felt like they were stuck between a rock and a hard place because they hated both candidates

The fact that 3 million more people voted for Clinton than Trump, and yet Trump is president, is surely completely broken as an electoral system. And yet, the people who would defend Trump's legitimacy are the same ones who are adamant that the binary UK-wide referendum vote is more relevant than the demographics and geography of the vote. Whichever suits, I guess

[Vicky.]

This is not surprising, nor is the few supporting it on here tbh. Some people just seem to hate women. What good will cutting back on services do? Even if this was an outright ban on abortions, that would do no good either, force people to have babies they don't want...or having to go backstreet and risking their lives

Truth...you realise that forcing women to have babies will tend to end up with men paying out a lot of money for these unwanted children? Tax payers paying more also, care systems being dragged to their knees, and so on?

Also **** this 'baby' stuff...its not like killing a baby at all. If it is, then even stuff like the morning after pill and such are potential baby murderers.

[StephenPullen]

What's the problem with not forcing tax payers to fund abortions if they do not believe in the practice?

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

This is not surprising, nor is the few supporting it on here tbh. Some people just seem to hate women. What good will cutting back on services do? Even if this was an outright ban on abortions, that would do no good either, force people to have babies they don't want...or having to go backstreet and risking their lives

Truth...you realise that forcing women to have babies will tend to end up with men paying out a lot of money for these unwanted children? Tax payers paying more also, care systems being dragged to their knees, and so on?

Also **** this 'baby' stuff...its not like killing a baby at all. If it is, then even stuff like the morning after pill and such are potential baby murderers.

Exactly. I notice Truth won't answer my question that I've asked him multiple times on the thread. He says Abortion should only be allowed to women who are raped but if it's acceptable to do it then you can't actually believe it's murdering a baby because if you truly believed that then it would never be acceptable no matter what the circumstances

[Vicky.]

Originally Posted by StephenPullen

What's the problem with not forcing tax payers to fund abortions if they do not believe in the practice?

Instead force taxpayers to pay out a ****load more cash for unwanted babies? Sense..

I don't believe in a lot of stuff my taxes go on tbh

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by StephenPullen

What's the problem with not forcing tax payers to fund abortions if they do not believe in the practice?

Did he ask the Tax payers first?