[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

How dare you! Titanic is iconic. Yes it is objectively bad but, also, it is brilliant.



He's also a good Tyler Durden but, again, I wouldn't say he's really "acting" and also Tyler Durden is a very two dimensional character, a caricature really, by design

Spoiler:

as he isn't actually a full character, he's a small piece of Edward Norton's character, so isn't SUPPOSED to have depth. But yes was chosen for the role based on his looks / body as he's the "idealised" image that Norton character is supposed to have of himself.

Yeah I suppose in a way Ty;er Durden fits in with me examples, he's good at playing not very serious jokey type characters, it's like he lacks the emotional depth to play a serious character in a believable way

Originally Posted by Marsh.

I actually think that's been a pretty popular opinion for years. Somewhere around 10 years ago it started being a guilty pleasure and people wouldn't admit to having liked it.

Oh God no, I have guilty pleasure movies but Titanic isn't one of them. I've only ever watched it once and will never watch it again


Her's one that might be controversial..........Robert DeNiro, as good an actor as he is, isn't very versatile imo Every role he plays he comes across the same to me. Al pacino is a far superior actor imo as is Daniel Day Lewis