[Beso]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

I thought that pretty much covered it?



As I said, I knew what to expect before I even opened the thread, because I've been here long enough. Make of that what you will?

No it doesnt cover it at all..sounds like you are accusing me of racism in a round about way..sneekily avoiding actually saying it to avoid the ban...you know, like you usually do. Next time i will add a wee story in the op just for you, even though the link says it all.

But thanks for derailing my thread with your stupid personal attacks.

[Toy Soldier]

Originally Posted by parmnion

No it doesnt cover it at all..sounds like you are accusing me of racism in a round about way..sneekily avoiding actually saying it to avoid the ban...you know, like you usually do. Next time i will add a wee story in the op just for you, even though the link says it all.

But thanks for derailing my thread with your stupid personal attacks.

Well that's the thing isn't it. You're trying to bait me into saying how I knew what the link was going to be about before I opened the thread, because you know that to explain how I knew, I have to get personal which is against the rules. Baiting, of course, is also against the rules.

But, meh, **** it. I knew what was going to be in the link before I clicked it because I saw your username. And whilst I'm not "accusing you of racism", I do have a pretty good idea which "side of the fence" you fall on when it comes to recent issues / threads. Yes, I could probably be accused of pre-judging the thread based on who created it, but... err... I wasn't wrong, was I. I saw your name, I expected it to be a "shocking" bait-n-switch with a foreign "villain", it did not disappoint.

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

Well that's the thing isn't it. You're trying to bait me into saying how I knew what the link was going to be about before I opened the thread, because you know that to explain how I knew, I have to get personal which is against the rules. Baiting, of course, is also against the rules.

But, meh, **** it. I knew what was going to be in the link before I clicked it because I saw your username. And whilst I'm not "accusing you of racism", I do have a pretty good idea which "side of the fence" you fall on when it comes to recent issues / threads. Yes, I could probably be accused of pre-judging the thread based on who created it, but... err... I wasn't wrong, was I. I saw your name, I expected it to be a "shocking" bait-n-switch with a foreign "villain", it did not disappoint.

I guess that could be like DR putting my Hungarian Village thread into a list of so called anti muslim threads in her rant ...I mean blog, you shouldn't always presume!

[Toy Soldier]

Originally Posted by Cherie

I guess that could be like DR putting my Hungarian Village thread into a list of so called anti muslim threads in her rant ...I mean blog, you shouldn't always presume!

But I wasn't wrong

[Beso]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

But I wasn't wrong

How the **** is it baiting ffs..like i explained, a racist is a racist..but its people like you that are infact a bit racist when you are saying i should have mentioned that the racist in question was a muslim.. does this mean people should state everyones religion pr colour in every news story? Or does it just apply to news stories regarding muslims?

To me your need to have someones race/religion or whatever posted in a thread title is a lot more racist than anything i have ever posted on here...and by the way i have never been banned for anything remotely racist on here..EVER..i suggest you look at the pix on my profile mate before backhandidly accusing me of being a racist.

[Beso]

Oh and by the way TS..you stated somewhere above that he was a "foriegner" the article doesnt mention his nationality...do you see everyone with brown skin as foriegners?