| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
| Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
I'm no evolutionary scientist.. but throwing away the 'it began in Africa' theory because they found 7.2million year old fossils of an ape-like creature in Europe, as opposed to the young and vibrant 7million year old fossils of Africa seems a bit irrational.
__________________
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#2 | ||
|
|||
|
Senior Member
|
Well they can only go with the evidence they've got.They may find an older one in Africa or Asia or anywhere.But for now Europe is the birth place of humanity
|
||
|
|
|
|
#3 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
I cant imagine the article would have been published if they claimed Europe was the birthplace of humanity lol. You cant just draw conclusions like that. Well, Sarah Knapton of the Telegraph can.. but like what does she know apart from clickbait101
__________________
Last edited by Withano; 24-05-2017 at 10:39 PM. |
|||
|
|
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|