[Withano]

Looks like the topic moved on a bit, but if you guys are still interested, the legend said this about that

"I didn't have the exact figure in front of me so I was unable to answer that question, for which obviously I apologise, but I don't apologise for what's in the manifesto, and I will explain exactly what the cost is. It's £4.8 billion by the end of the parliament, and it means 1 million children will get free childcare, 30 hours per week between the years of 2 and 4. "

[Beso]

Originally Posted by Withano

Looks like the topic moved on a bit, but if you guys are still interested, the legend said this about that

"I didn't have the exact figure in front of me so I was unable to answer that question, for which obviously I apologise, but I don't apologise for what's in the manifesto, and I will explain exactly what the cost is. It's £4.8 billion by the end of the parliament, and it means 1 million children will get free childcare, 30 hours per week between the years of 2 and 4. "

I wouldnt let any labour government make decisions on my children.

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by Withano

Looks like the topic moved on a bit, but if you guys are still interested, the legend said this about that

"I didn't have the exact figure in front of me so I was unable to answer that question, for which obviously I apologise, but I don't apologise for what's in the manifesto, and I will explain exactly what the cost is. It's £4.8 billion by the end of the parliament, and it means 1 million children will get free childcare, 30 hours per week between the years of 2 and 4. "

It won't even be acknowledged that he apologised sincerely.

The Chancellor was way out on a figure recently but that doesn't get a mention.
At least Corbyn admitted he hadn't prepared for that programme properly by having the figure.

It was not the only figure he would have had to have that day either.
Even had he said,I haven't the figure to hand,sorry I cannot give the exact cost at this time.
The vultures would have still dived in to attack him for even that.

While at the same time ignoring the fact that the Cons and their lying leader,are near all the time,telling no one any of their costings,virtually saying voters have to 'wait and see' no matter how high those costs will be.

One things for sure,if the Cons costs of their policies were only modest or lower than Labour's,they'd be parading them proudly,not deceitfully hiding them from voters.
Voters who have a right to know them too.
Just as they have the right to know the cost Jeremy Corbyn didn't have to hand at that moment in his interview.