[Tom4784]

Brillo going back to her 'if you don't agree with me you're basically a terrorist sympathiser' schtick when her silly suggestions about essentially bringing back exile (and taking the very North Korean approach of punishing multiple generations in the process) is shot down because it's not realistic, possible or even a good idea? I'm shocked.

People with a British passport or citizenship are our responsibility to bring to justice, the idea of desperately looking for an excuse to hand people over to other countries is laughable and wrong. The level of extremism from certain right wing members in this section is getting rather worrisome.

[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

Brillo going back to her 'if you don't agree with me you're basically a terrorist sympathiser' schtick when her silly suggestions about essentially bringing back exile (and taking the very North Korean approach of punishing multiple generations in the process) is shot down because it's not realistic, possible or even a good idea? I'm shocked.

People with a British passport or citizenship are our responsibility to bring to justice, the idea of desperately looking for an excuse to hand people over to other countries is laughable and wrong. The level of extremism from certain right wing members in this section is getting rather worrisome.

My posts do not justify attempting to call me a right-ring extremist. That is ridiculous.

People have talked of the possibility of deportation of TERRORISTS (seems necessarry to highlight that word) for some time now including the government. I was suggesting a viable way that maybe that could be achieved. I know you will never agree with it that but don't you dare try to use this to call me a right-ring extremist.

And btw I never suggested you were a terrorist sympathiser, you took it that way to suit. So you think I have implied that so you get your revenge by calling me a right-wing extremist. I have never committed a terrorist attack in my life thank you - and you talk of boundaries.

And no need for the 'her' - if you want to make such comments then have the decency to address me personally rather than say 'Brillo, going back to her....'. Weak, putting it mildly.

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Brillopad

My posts do not justify attempting to call me a right-ring extremist. That is ridiculous.

People have talked of the possibility of deportation of TERRORISTS (seems necessarry to highlight that word) for some time now including the government. I was suggesting a viable way that maybe that could be achieved. I know you will never agree with it that but don't you dare try to use this to call me a right-ring extremist.

And btw I never suggested you were a terrorist sympathiser, you took it that way to suit. So you think I have implied that so you get your revenge by calling me a right-wing extremist. I have never committed a terrorist attack in my life thank you - and you talk of boundaries.

I wouldn't call you a right-wing extremist because you don't have the power to actually enact any of your bizarre fantasies. But I don't think it would be unfair to suggest that you are a... right-wing extremist sympathiser? You promote and express admiration of extreme right-wing measures, surely?

[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

I wouldn't call you a right-wing extremist because you don't have the power to actually enact any of your bizarre fantasies. But I don't think it would be unfair to suggest that you are a... right-wing extremist sympathiser? You promote and express admiration of extreme right-wing measures, surely?

By deporting terrorists! In what other way have I demonstrated being a right-wing sympathiser?

You lean left I lean right - no extremism involved on either side, unless of course you have something substantial to substantiate such a bizarre comment.

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Brillopad

By deporting terrorists! In what other way have I demonstrated being a right-wing sympathiser?

You lean left I lean right - no extremism involved on either side, unless of course you have something substantial to substantiate such a bizarre comment.

The concept of deporting 3rd generation immigrants to non-specific countries of "genetic and cultural origin" as a counter-terror measure. Supporting armed soldiers being on our streets. Advocating the removal or reducation of civil liberties in exchange for "keeping us safe". The idea that every Muslim immigrant is responsible for curbing the actions of extremists. None of these are just "right leaning", Brillo, at least have the courage of your convictions.

[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

The concept of deporting 3rd generation immigrants to non-specific countries of "genetic and cultural origin" as a counter-terror measure. Supporting armed soldiers being on our streets. Advocating the removal or reducation of civil liberties in exchange for "keeping us safe". The idea that every Muslim immigrant is responsible for curbing the actions of extremists. None of these are just "right leaning", Brillo, at least have the courage of your convictions.

Nothing substantial in that little list. Is that it?

Commonsense determines we need armed soldiers on the streets at the moment, how you manage to describe that as right-wing is beyond me. And nothing wrong with people feeling Muslims should speak up more against ISIS.

If you really feel any of the above are right-wing extremism maybe that's because you must be at the other extreme and that's why such views seem so far out there to you.

[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

I wouldn't call you a right-wing extremist because you don't have the power to actually enact any of your bizarre fantasies. But I don't think it would be unfair to suggest that you are a... right-wing extremist sympathiser? You promote and express admiration of extreme right-wing measures, surely?

What power is there in being a terrorist - just a gang of armed thugs who target innocent unarmed people. I wouldn't call that power - just cowardice.

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Brillopad

What power is there in being a terrorist - just a gang of armed thugs who target innocent unarmed people. I wouldn't call that power - just cowardice.

I don't think he was suggesting that you don't have the Power to become a terrorist.

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Brillopad

What power is there in being a terrorist - just a gang of armed thugs who target innocent unarmed people. I wouldn't call that power - just cowardice.

I'm not "bigging up terrorists" ffs, just pointing out that you're (thankfully) not in a position where you can actually influence or further your bizarre hard right "bloodline exile policy".

[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

I'm not "bigging up terrorists" ffs, just pointing out that you're (thankfully) not in a position where you can actually influence or further your bizarre hard right "bloodline exile policy".

Hard right, if you say so.

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Brillopad

Hard right, if you say so.

I do say so and, if we've learned anything from the last couple of months on Tibb, it's that I'm always right.

Or that you're always... Err... right.

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by Brillopad

My posts do not justify attempting to call me a right-ring extremist. That is ridiculous.

People have talked of the possibility of deportation of TERRORISTS (seems necessarry to highlight that word) for some time now including the government. I was suggesting a viable way that maybe that could be achieved. I know you will never agree with it that but don't you dare try to use this to call me a right-ring extremist.

And btw I never suggested you were a terrorist sympathiser, you took it that way to suit. So you think I have implied that so you get your revenge by calling me a right-wing extremist. I have never committed a terrorist attack in my life thank you - and you talk of boundaries.

And no need for the 'her' - if you want to make such comments then have the decency to address me personally rather than say 'Brillo, going back to her....'. Weak, putting it mildly.

You are not a politician, mentioning the word 'terrorist' at every opportunity won't adhere people to your views, nor will suggesting that anyone who thinks differently has sympathy towards terrorism. Don't deny you've not insinuated that because you have.

Nothing you have suggested is viable, We can't force people out of the country and onto other countries because of a vague ancestral link. You only think it's viable because you don't understand international law.

Also because you seem quite confused on the matter, extremist does not always equal terrorist. Katie Hopkins is an extremist, Richard Spencer is an extremist, UKIP is half full of extremists, Trump is an extremist etc. None of them will commit acts of terror but they are still extreme in their views.