[Tom4784]

I'll give you one last reply.

Originally Posted by jet

Now where did I say that? I really do think you have difficulty with comprehension, and I'm not just being sarcastic here. Or maybe you are once again using diversion tactics.
Please post a quote where I say or imply some links to terrorism are okay.
You won't be able to, because I don't think ANY terrorism is okay.

Now let me spell out for you why I say Sinn Fein are worse than the DUP, imo.
Sinn Fein are the official political party of the terrorist IRA. The DuP are not the official political party of any terrorist organisation, and never have been.
Sinn Fein still have murderers in their party in high positions representing N. Ireland. The DUP have not, and have never had murderers in their party representing N. Ireland.
Got that?

I support neither the DUP nor Sinn Fein. I support neither Torys nor Labour. I have supported and been loyal to the SDLP for more than 30 years, the N. Irish party with no links to terrorism that I know of.

I am not in the least concerned about the DUP or whatever terrorist links they had because none of their members have a chance of becoming the Prime Minister of the UK. Your terrorist supporter Corbyn does, and not just with the IRA either, and I think that is why you twist others words and use diversionary tactics because you know his solid links to terrorism are true and you feel guilty about not caring.

You said it yourself 'They are not as bad as Sinn Fein'. One would think that proven terrorist links would be enough to condemn them as you would Sinn Fein but the DUP opposes JC so obviously you can excuse their links and will do so through any means necessary. My reading comprehension is fine, your short term memory? Might need some work because you are literally saying what I said you were saying in my last post 'The DUP aren't murderers so it's k.'

I've asked this a thousand times and never actually got a good answer but I'll ask it again. In the world of politics where one wrong statement or scandal will end your career, how is it that, if these accusations towards JC have any merit, he's still in power? He has most of the media and a lot of the sheep constantly looking to bring him down on top of actual enemies that COULD bring him down yet this scandal which if true would end his career overnight hasn't managed to do so in the months since the story blew up. Why?

It's because it's likely been misrepresented and overblown, you can't have the enemies that JC has and be involved in a legitimate scandal and still stay in power.

Originally Posted by jet

And you are overly cold and and cannot hold a debate because you can't answer simple questions directly. I asked 'how is the money being wasted'? and you bleated on about bribes and diverted, diverted, diverted over and over again. Until you become more mature and aware of what is actually being asked it is pointless discussing anything with you.
Are bribes wrong? Of course. But I'm pretty sure it is not the first time any government has used them to ensure they have the seats or anything else they needed, whether that was behind closed doors payouts or other 'secret' deals which benefited the party they needed whatever it was from. You really don't believe that politics is as pure as the driven snow do you?
At least this deal was upfront and out in the open. Get over it.

I've answered directly, you are just a brick wall when it comes to answers you dislike and you proved it in this post. Also it's obviously very mature to repeat what I said verbatim but you should honestly work on the context since repeating what I said without the correct context in place makes that barb a bit of a flop. Nice try though I'd give it a 'You tried' gold star.

Your second paragraph is hilarious, it's you trying to justify bribes yet, if it was JC doing the bribe, you'd be calling for his head, oh and since you are very predictable I'll answer the point you'll inevitably try to attack me with in your followup post. No, I would not defend JC if the tables were reversed and he bribed the DUP instead. The DUP should never be anywhere near power because they are a bunch of bigots and such a deal would be a betrayal of values from Corbyn.

When it comes to politics, my only allegiance is to the NHS, it is the only issue I truly care about. My agenda alligns with Labour at this point but it won't likely stay that way because I personally think party loyalty is for fools.

There's nothing more to be said but since you like having the last word I'll let you have it since I know you need to feel like you've scored points against me. Consider it my gift to you, as empty as it will be. I'm happy enough just being the better person and walking away, which is exactly what I'm doing now.

[jet]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

I'll give you one last reply.
You said it yourself 'They are not as bad as Sinn Fein'. One would think that proven terrorist links would be enough to condemn them as you would Sinn Fein but the DUP opposes JC so obviously you can excuse their links and will do so through any means necessary. My reading comprehension is fine, your short term memory? Might need some work because you are literally saying what I said you were saying in my last post 'The DUP aren't murderers so it's k.'
.

No, that is what YOU were saying I said, because you can't find a quote where I actually said that as it doesn't exist. I said they weren't as bad as Sinn Fein, because its true, that is all. I condemn ALL terrorists links.


You obviously don't think Sinn Fein are worse than the DUP...
So you think that having murderers in high profile positions in a political party is on a par with a party that don't? Wow.
So you think a party that is the official one of a terrorist organisation is on a par with one that isn't? Wow.

You obviously excuse Sinn Fein/IRA because of their links with Corbyn. I have never seen you condemn them when I pointed out their gruesome links to terrorism but you constantly condemn the DUP because they oppose Corbyn.

[jet]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

I've asked this a thousand times and never actually got a good answer but I'll ask it again. In the world of politics where one wrong statement or scandal will end your career, how is it that, if these accusations towards JC have any merit, he's still in power? He has most of the media and a lot of the sheep constantly looking to bring him down on top of actual enemies that COULD bring him down yet this scandal which if true would end his career overnight hasn't managed to do so in the months since the story blew up. Why?

It's because it's likely been misrepresented and overblown, you can't have the enemies that JC has and be involved in a legitimate scandal and still stay in power.

Your second paragraph is hilarious, it's you trying to justify bribes yet, if it was JC doing the bribe, you'd be calling for his head, oh and since you are very predictable I'll answer the point you'll inevitably try to attack me with in your followup post. No, I would not defend JC if the tables were reversed and he bribed the DUP instead. The DUP should never be anywhere near power because they are a bunch of bigots and such a deal would be a betrayal of values from Corbyn.

And I've asked a thousand times why he hasn't sued or refused to condemn the IRA. There has been plenty of press and TV about Corbyn's IRA support but his fanatics don't care, so what is the point of pushing it? It only makes them support him more cos they think the poor ole harmless luvvie is being persecuted.
Time will expose him for what he is.

Milliband and Brown both tried to get the DUP on board, (tut tut). You wouldn't like him going near the DUP though, I know that. Sinn Fein, his buddies, with their resident murderers, would fit better with his values.