[caprimint]

Originally Posted by RobertC

Chanelle wasn't perfect but she didn't have some weird psycho-manipulative air about her where she leads some vulnerable girl on for her own gain whilst constantly "letting them down easy", nor did she ever demean someone for their appearance/how relevant of a human being they were. She was argumentative sure and could be a little out there but actual malice with her wasn't nearly as high as Lotan. There's a good reason she got a couple mini-warnings whereas he was removed swiftly.

Originally Posted by RobertC

No, Isabelle couldn't have a legit conversation with him because he constantly attacked her for her opinions, her looks, her relevance as a person, being a patronizing twat, etc. so she decided to take matters into her own hands and take him down at his own game. Using big words so you can win an argument doesn't automatically mean you're intelligent. It can also mean you're just a tool.

Also anyone who freaks out, flinging their drink, screaming and busting against diary room walls, leaving a diary room and having to be dragged back in, and threatening to "****ing destroy" Isabelle cameras or no cameras all simply over the "Role model to yer son though???" comment thrown at them is no true intellectual.

But she didn't 'take him down' at all She just hung onto Chanelle's crew (knowing that they were already popular, plus Kieran didn't want anything to do with her so she practically had nowhere else to go) in hope that it would benefit her and it did ironically.

Chanelle did more 'violent' things than Lotan ever did but remained in the house. It's called favouritism.

I'm also not saying I agree with everything Lotan did/said, but Isabelle was far more nasty to him than vice versa.