[Cherry Christmas]

Originally Posted by Christmas treeza

It's exactly the same issue, sorry if it throws your theory of the lady just being a bit dumb or it being an administrative error out the window.

on the contrary it totally reinforces my point that admin are completely incompetent, have either of these people been forced to leave the country..err...no ..what does that tell you, that people in post are incompetent and are far from being passionate about their jobs as you claim, and on top of that are not bothered in the least about wasting public money. :/

and I never once claimed admin ERROR! Or that the lady was dumb!

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by Candy Cane

on the contrary it totally reinforces my point that admin are completely incompetent, have either of these people been forced to leave the country..err...no ..what does that tell you, that people in post are incompetent and are far from being passionate about their jobs as you claim, and on top of that are not bothered in the least about wasting public money. :/

and I never once claimed admin ERROR!

No it really doesn't it reinforces my theory that this is nothing but an exercise to remove 'undesirables' regardless of how long they have been resident in this country.

I don't believe that there is any incompetence, in actuality they are doing their job perfectly, I'm certain that this action is their brief.

[Cherry Christmas]

Originally Posted by Christmas treeza

No it really doesn't it reinforces my theory that this is nothing but an exercise to remove 'undesirables' regardless of how long they have been resident in this country.

I don't believe that there is any incompetence, in actuality they are doing their job perfectly, I'm certain that this action is their brief.

They are doing their job perfectly? Neither of these two should have been in the system in the first place. All that time wasted and where are they ....here! If that is your idea of a job done perfectly I really do give up !!! And if as you say they are being briefed to get people out of the country who can legally be here and can't be removed and even if they were removed would still be entitled to benefits/pensions it beggars belief and really stretches the imagination

And finally why are either of these people undesirable in you opinion

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by Candy Cane

They are doing their job perfectly? Neither of these two should have been in the system in the first place. All that time wasted and where are they ....here! If that is your idea of a job done perfectly I really do give up !!! And if as you say they are being briefed to get people out of the country who can legally be here and can't be removed and even if they were removed would still be entitled to benefits/pensions it beggars belief and really stretches the imagination

And finally why are either of these people undesirable in you opinion

As I said they are easy pickings for the 100 a day target.

I'm not asking you to agree with me but that's how I see this issue with these cases of people from commonwealth countries who entered as kids and can't prove they were here prior to the 70s having little or no paperwork as evidence.

I don't see why it's so much of a stretch when you've heard of people sitting work capability assessments, being found fit for work and dying the same week!
I've specified who the undesirables are earlier in the thread candy, keep up.

[Cherry Christmas]

Originally Posted by Christmas treeza

As I said they are easy pickings for the 100 a day target.

I'm not asking you to agree with me but that's how I see this issue with these cases of people from commonwealth countries who entered as kids and can't prove they were here prior to the 70s having little or no paperwork as evidence.

I don't see why it's so much of a stretch when you've heard of people sitting work capability assessments, being found fit for work and dying the same week!
I've specified who the undesirables are earlier in the thread candy, keep up.

The 100 day target in your link referred to EU citizens unless Jamaica has moved

and this pair don't seem to fall into what your opinion of being an undesirable is, so hence I asked the question Teresa

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by Candy Cane

The 100 day target in your link referred to EU citizens unless Jamaica has moved

and this pair don't seem to fall into what your opinion of being an undesirable is, so hence I asked the question Teresa

It's not just the EU it's non EU, 'new' commonwealth, commonwealth also

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukne...portation.html

http://www.voice-online.co.uk/articl...g-commonwealth

These people are old, at or approaching retirement age. past their usefulness....undesirable.