Home Menu

Site Navigation


Notices

Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics.

Register to reply Log in to reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 11-03-2018, 06:44 PM #10
Vicky. Vicky. is offline
0_o
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 65,839


Vicky. Vicky. is offline
0_o
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 65,839


Default

Quote:
The articles written in protest over their malign coup have been successfully dismissed as smears. The voices raised against them discounted as political agitation. The facts detailing their racist insurrection recast as ‘fake news’.
I don't accept this as a reason at all. This is basically saying anything could come out about Corbyn, with absolute proof, and neither the Tories nor the press would actually say anything about it, all because a few Corbyn fanatics would dismiss it as fake? Nah. Everyone has their fanatics, who will dismiss anything negative about their idol. Kinda the whole point of being a fanatic. But most of the public are not like this, and I totally refuse to believe that no fuss is being made of this simply because it would be dismissed as a smear Also no way I am reading 150 pages on this when I have already seen enough to prove Corbyn has some very dodgy views anyway, so it doesn't really interest me as such.

AND, it is entirely possible that he did not read the comments on stuff. Thats not an excuse, he might well have seen them. I am slightly tempted to waste hours to read that whole document, to see if he replied TO any of the anti-semetic comments. Like directly to them, which would prove beyond doubt that he did read them. Answering a post that has some dodgy comments on it, doesn't really prove anything. On FB I don't tend to click the 'view previous comments' bit in groups, I just add my own comment to the original post. I cannot be the only one who does this? Or I will read the comments, ignore anything troll like, and only reply to people who speak sense. I don't tend to pull people up on offensive posts as..whats the point? It just sets people off arguing. Ignoring them is the best way, and possibly reporting them to FB if they are too bad. Also from that screenshot, it looks like he only replied on there as he was tagged? So indeed may have only read that one comment that tagged him

Either way though, I just do not accept that this is all brushed under the carpet because the press think there is no point reporting it as apparently noone will believe it, when they put Corbyn front page for taking a train or farting ffs

I know people will read this and brush it off as making excuses for him. But I am far from Corbyns biggest fan. Might have supported him at one stage, but not for months and months now.

Last edited by Vicky.; 11-03-2018 at 06:50 PM.
Vicky. is offline  
Register to reply Log in to reply

Bookmark/share this topic

Tags
antissemtic, secret


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:16 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

"Big Brother and UK Television Forum. Est. 2001"

 

© 2023
no new posts