[Withano]

Originally Posted by Rob!

I know there is a reasonable logic behind the theory that “members should just obey the rules” but using my own history with infractions as an example, when someone is being blatantly bigoted and it’s clear they’re deliberately doing so, it’s going to make me stand up for whichever minority I might be a part of, homophobia for example. When said members are allowed to continue posting the same sort of thing and yet other people seem to be the ones getting infracted and banned, it doesn’t seem fair at all, in fact it just looks like they are being allowed to continue with their behaviour, so I don’t see how it can not be expected that arguments are going to break out?

I’d like to think you wouldn’t be infracted for that unless you insult the person who you’re arguing with? And the person you’re arguing with would be infracted for their homophobia?
But if that sort of thing aint happening, then I agree, its one of the things that needs to be changed.

Its the ‘baiting’ infraction that winds me up. So many members have hundreds, or thousands (literally) of baiting posts