[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by unoino

Quite easy You go to police station and say I want to press charges for false allegations...Then he gets a lawyer and prosecution have to prove beyond all reasonable doubt that he did it....the fact he said he touched her gown doesnt constitute an assault...

You are completely ignoring the fact that his account of what happened in the bathroom was the same as Chloes though, nobody has to prove anything beyond reasonable doubt because Jeremy is recorded on TV saying that he did exactly what Chloe said he did

Ugh right that's my last post on this with you because we seem to be going round in circles now

[the truth]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

You are completely ignoring the fact that his account of what happened in the bathroom was the same as Chloes though, nobody has to prove anything beyond reasonable doubt because Jeremy is recorded on TV saying that he did exactly what Chloe said he did

Ugh right that's my last post on this with you because we seem to be going round in circles now

youre going round in circles im going straight, youre ducking the questions as usual

[rusticgal]

Some strange opinions on here... IMO Chloe wasn't invading his space she went to help him along with Cami and Nadia...he never asked them to get out at any stage. Chloe obviously had not long come out of the shower hence not being dressed...you don't think of getting dressed when you helping someone!!
Chloe never expected that Jeremy would 'take a peek'...it was a daft thing for Jeremy to do...but he didn't grope her, he exposed her boob, it was inappropriate and took Chloe by surprise. For someone who did topless modelling you have to have confidence and a certain amount of brashness to expose yourself to camera men etc let alone allow it to be published to the nation...she ain't no shrinking violet!!...that doesn't make what Jeremy did right. She had every right to be a bit upset or angry for that matter.
I think it was all taken well out of proportion and ultimately it led to her eviction...

[the truth]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

Some strange opinions on here... IMO Chloe wasn't invading his space she went to help him along with Cami and Nadia...he never asked them to get out at any stage. Chloe obviously had not long come out of the shower hence not being dressed...you don't think of getting dressed when you helping someone!!
Chloe never expected that Jeremy would 'take a peek'...it was a daft thing for Jeremy to do...but he didn't grope her, he exposed her boob, it was inappropriate and took Chloe by surprise. For someone who did topless modelling you have to have confidence and a certain amount of brashness to expose yourself to camera men etc let alone allow it to be published to the nation...she ain't no shrinking violet!!...that doesn't make what Jeremy did right. She had every right to be a bit upset or angry for that matter.
I think it was all taken well out of proportion and ultimately it led to her eviction...

not strange opinons, just actual genuine common sense opinions that are banned from mainstream tv because on there freedom of speech is banned unless youre attacking hetrosexual men

[Ace]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

You are completely ignoring the fact that his account of what happened in the bathroom was the same as Chloes though, nobody has to prove anything beyond reasonable doubt because Jeremy is recorded on TV saying that he did exactly what Chloe said he did

Ugh right that's my last post on this with you because we seem to be going round in circles now

Jeremy's account of what happened seems immaterial to me and so is her being naked under the dressing gown.

By Chloe's account of what happen he did not attack her, he did not try to disrobe her, nor did he try to expose her.

Initially, she handled it appropriately by telling him she didn't like what he did and leaving immediately. But after she left the bathroom she overreacted, egged on by some of the other women in the house. She stood directly outside the bathroom hyperventilating recounting the incident. This seems like crying wolf, but in truth its an overreaction since something actually did happen. If she was so traumatized by the experience she'd have gotten as far away from Jeremy as she could.

The incident was blow out of proportion by Chloe's behaviour outside the bathroom and some of the HMs reactions.

[Beso]

Originally Posted by unoino

Lastnights BB saw Cammi parading in nothing but thong and very small bra...it also showed her stating "hurting for a squirting"...and then cavorting all over Callum Best...she appeared to be desperate for Cxxx....now then putting things into prespective..Chloe got a guy thrown out..receiving a warning from police...branded a rapist..having to sign a sex offenders register and tarninshing his career...because he touched Chloes dressing gown...if Callum was to of reacted in the same way as Chloe did...would they have charged Cammi with sexual assault and evicted her!

wheres the double standard?

[unoino]

What you onabout now...do I have to explain again...

[abhorson]

No feeding from me

[unoino]

Im glad your goin cos ur clearly not listening..people change statements hourly..we didnt see anything it wasnt recorded so how would she prove he assaulted her...

[Beso]

that chloe slapper has got the sun to stop page 3 as well..tart.

[unoino]

Listen Do you have the same respect for a stripper or model or prostitute as you would for your mom....No...Thankyou!

[bots]

Originally Posted by unoino

Listen Do you have the same respect for a stripper or model or prostitute as you would for your mom....No...Thankyou!

So they are lower class people not worthy of respect and should not be afforded the same rights and protections as everyone else? I really hope that's not what you are implying

Originally Posted by unoino

Do I have respect for drugdealers cos they drive big fast cars..err no !

Not relevant

[unoino]

Do I have respect for drugdealers cos they drive big fast cars..err no !

[unoino]

Your repeating yourself...the fact that there is obviously divided opinion on this puts the whole validity of her allegation into prespective...and what Im saying to you is that people are judgemental...yes were suppossed to be impartial but if I was on the jury on whether Jeremy indecently assaulted her Id find him not guilty...not that it would get that far..just because the police charge somebody doesnt mean the cps would take it to court.!

[unoino]

Sorry Truth that wasnt aimed at you

[Jack The Cat]

Well, that escalated quickly.

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Jack The Cat

Well, that escalated quickly.

[the truth]

Originally Posted by Jack The Cat

Well, that escalated quickly.

brick killed aman with a spear, if I was him id lay low for a while ,he may be wanted for murder

[unoino]

Your correct Rionablue..apology and move on...too late she crucified him...and then regretted it...she didnt press charges because she knew shed gone to far...and before a judge and jury under the circumstances..on a reality show where you shock to win votes...she realized cps wouldnt prosecute...as there was no evidence...it was Jeremys word against hers and I might remind you touching a girls dressing gown doesnt constitute an assault...but if we assume it does and she takes him to court..do you really believe that when she went into bathroom alone..knowing he was drunk..knowing she gets paid to expose her body..knowing that she put her tits in his face...do you really believe a jury would find him guilty?...I and many many others would not only find him not guilty but its a joke to think the case wouldnt be thrown out...oh and by the way about 3.6 million viewers saw what you and I saw...NOTHING !