[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Smithy

Tibbs first self confessed Meghan hater?

Congrats Cherrie

If it makes you happy go ahead, sure I have been called worse Smitty

[Zizu]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

Meghan Markle's half-sister Samantha SLAMS her Oprah interview, accusing

Duchess of using 'depression as an excuse to treat people like dishrags' - and

firing back at her claim that they haven't seen each other in 20 years

• Samantha, 56, who shares a father, Thomas, with Meghan, 39, unleashed a furious rant against her half-sister in the wake of her bombshell Oprah interview
  
• On Monday morning, new clips from the interview showed Meghan discussing her relationship with her father and Samantha
  
• She accused her dad of 'betraying her' and said that her half-sister Samantha 'doesn't know her' and claimed they haven't seen each other in 20 years
  
• Samantha shared proof to refute this claim, sharing images of herself and Meghan at her college graduation 13 years ago
  
• Meghan also claimed in the interview clips that Samantha only changed her name back to Markle when her half-sister began dating Harry
  
• Samantha shared evidence to the contrary, revealing that she filed a petition to change her last name to Markle in December 1997
  
• When asked about Meghan's admission that she struggled with suicidal thoughts, Samantha accused her of using her mental health as 'an excuse'
  
• 'Depression is not an excuse for treating people like dishrags and disposing of them,' she said of her half-sibling's struggle
  

Meghan Markle's half-sister Samantha has slammed the royal's bombshell

interview with Oprah Winfrey, saying 'the truth was totally ignored and

omitted' while providing photos and documents to disprove each of the

Duchess of Sussex's claims about her.



The 56-year-old also admitted that she has no sympathy for Meghan, 39,

who revealed during the shocking interview that she battled suicidal thoughts

during her time as a royal - instead accusing the Duchess of using her

'depression as an excuse for treating people like dishrags'



https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/a...interview.html



Its not looking good for Meghan...

It is looking very good for her sister’s bank account though ..


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[Glenn.]

Such a repulsive woman. I hope she’s getting paid good

[jet]

Another, er, inconsistency - Reverend David Green "Its not legal to have your own vows, you can't get married twice.

Meghan "Three days before our wedding, we got married. No - one knows that."

BBC - A spokesperson for the Sussexes' said it was a private exchange of vows
that had been 'incorrectly described' by Meghan.

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by jet

Another, er, inconsistency - Reverend David Green "Its not legal to have your own vows, you can't get married twice.

Meghan "Three days before our wedding, we got married. No - one knows that."

BBC - A spokesperson for the Sussexes' said it was a private exchange of vows
that had been 'incorrectly described' by Meghan.

So they did have a private exchange of vows like she said, it wasn't actually a lie? It's just nit picking at how she worded it? fgs

[jet]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

So they did have a private exchange of vows like she said, it wasn't actually a lie? It's just nit picking at how she worded it? fgs

She said 'we got married 3 days before' though, not 'we exchanged private vows' which is a totally different thing as that isn't getting married.
Which made people think her big wedding 3 days later presided over by the Archbishop of Canterbury was a sham.

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by jet

She said 'we got married 3 days before' though, not 'we exchanged private vows' which is a totally different thing as that isn't getting married.
Which made people think her big wedding 3 days later presided over by the Archbishop of Canterbury was a sham.

Why would it be a sham? I've been to plenty of weddings where the couple had gotten married a few days earlier in a registry office just for the legal stuff and then had their own ceremonies with all the guests to attend, I never felt I was attending a "sham"

Anyway, what she said actually did happen, she did exchange vows with her husband a few days previous so they could have something personal and private which seems like the point she was making, that actually happened. It's nit picking to say she's lying

[Jake.]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

So they did have a private exchange of vows like she said, it wasn't actually a lie? It's just nit picking at how she worded it? fgs

The grasping at straws is honestly ridiculous

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by jet

Another, er, inconsistency - Reverend David Green "Its not legal to have your own vows, you can't get married twice.

Meghan "Three days before our wedding, we got married. No - one knows that."

BBC - A spokesperson for the Sussexes' said it was a private exchange of vows
that had been 'incorrectly described' by Meghan.

Perhaps Meghan thought it was a wedding...but no one had told her otherwise

[jet]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

Perhaps Meghan thought it was a wedding...but no one had told her otherwise

[Zizu]

The palace have just released a statement ... just damage limitation from what I heard ..


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by Zizu

The palace have just released a statement ... just damage limitation from what I heard ..


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

I thought it was a fair and respectful response.

[Zizu]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

I thought it was a fair and respectful response.

That’s what I said ... damage limitation


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[bots]

Meghan and Harry knowingly put the queen in an impossible position. Claim there was racism but not specifically identify the culprit. It means the queen cannot refute it, so the only option given that is that it is and should have remained a private family matter, it was the only line she could take.

They may say they are still much loved, but that certainly wont be true of all the family, they have burnt a lot of bridges that wont be repaired

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

Meghan and Harry knowingly put the queen in an impossible position. Claim there was racism but not specifically identify the culprit. It means the queen cannot refute it, so the only option given that is that it is and should have remained a private family matter, it was the only line she could take.

They may say they are still much loved, but that certainly wont be true of all the family, they have burnt a lot of bridges that wont be repaired

Sadly so true...

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by Zizu

That’s what I said ... damage limitation


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Yeah you did sorry

[Jake.]

So, no actual proof of lies then. Just sounds besotted with bitterness.

[Parmy]

Heres another one .she said she knew nothing of harry before she met him, yet she was mates with eugene before she met him.

She also thought the royal family was what you saw in fairytales, even though she has been friends with eugene for a long time.

Shes a bit thick if you ask me...she didnt even know how to bend a knee for the queen...yet thought they only did that on official engagements so had obviously seen it.

And this is only 4minutes in

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by parmnion

Heres another one .she said she knew nothing of harry before she met him, yet she was mates with eugene before she met him.

She also thought the royal family was what you saw in fairytales, even though she has been friends with eugene for a long time.

Shes a bit thick if you ask me...she didnt even know how to bend a knee for the queen...yet thought they only did that on official engagements so had obviously seen it.

And this is only 4minutes in

I think she has lied so much in her life its now involuntary and she has no idea she is doing it

[jet]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

I think she has lied so much in her life its now involuntary and she has no idea she is doing it

We can tell though - her lips move.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by jet

We can tell though - her lips move.

on a serious note it is staggering

even in a setup like last night and meticulous editing to whitewash anything bad

it was riddled with lies and half-truths

imagine if she was interviewed by a real interviewer

her pr machine will do all they can to keep her away from this

[GoldHeart]

I find it disgusting that Meghan's mental health is being downplayed & doubted , god forbid if something had happened to her would people then be saying it's all "for attention" .

Non of us will ever know what it feels like to be in Harry & Meghan's shoes, we can only imagine .

And it's gut wrenching just hearing how she felt and what she was almost driven to, then there's the lack of support and care . Very cruel unfeeling system .

The media attacks alone are enough to give anyone depression, imagine every day lies and racist abuse being printed about you . How would people cope .

[jet]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

on a serious note it is staggering

even in a setup like last night and meticulous editing to whitewash anything bad

it was riddled with lies and half-truths

imagine if she was interviewed by a real interviewer

her pr machine will do all they can to keep her away from this

A real interviewer would insist that she name names when making allegations -

"Someone asked what colour the baby will be" - but not saying who.
"Someone said the baby will not be allowed a title because it will be mixed race" - but I'm not saying who.
"I was refused help for my mental state by someone" - but I'm not saying who.

On and on it went, 'not saying who' meant she could say what she liked without producing any evidence that the people she was accusing could answer to.
Sly and manipulative and blatantly unfair.

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by parmnion

Heres another one .she said she knew nothing of harry before she met him, yet she was mates with eugene before she met him.

She also thought the royal family was what you saw in fairytales, even though she has been friends with eugene for a long time.

Shes a bit thick if you ask me...she didnt even know how to bend a knee for the queen...yet thought they only did that on official engagements so had obviously seen it.

And this is only 4minutes in

So many inconsistances...I wouldn’t want her as a witness in court.

[bots]

i do think they are both a bit thick, some of the things i've heard them say, it's surprising they manage to dress themselves each morning