[alex_front2]

Danica is the ueber sleazy gitl next door.

[alex_front2]

The internet is creating/ reinventing/ updating so many sexual practices and peccedilos.

[Angus]

Originally Posted by alex_front2

I know there are sad men willing to give her gifts. But women do as well. What?!

Women are supposed to be shrewder. Men are often driven to stupidity by sex or the promise of sex. Women generally are not. What sort of women wants to buy gifts for her? Danica is not even attracted to women.

Why do women allow themselves to get 'rinsed' by her. What exactly is she offering in return?

What on earth is the problem? If men AND women are happy to be parted with their hard earned cash and are over the age of consent, it's nowt to do with anyone else. Who knows what it is that Danica "offers", and who, indeed, gives a sh*t?

My only beef with Danica is that it has elevated her to the status of "celebrity". Ditto Jasmine who is, after all, cut from the same cloth, and is only famous for hanging round with other actual celebs. She "prostitutes" herself just as much as Danica.

And what of the men who use prostitutes or women who use gigolos? They have to be the saddest idiots of all, having to pay for it, and then having the audacity to think they are somehow morally better than the people they use. It takes two to tango.

[alex_front2]

Originally Posted by Angus

What on earth is the problem? If men AND women are happy to be parted with their hard earned cash and are over the age of consent, it's nowt to do with anyone else. Who knows what it is that Danica "offers", and who, indeed, gives a sh*t?


And what of the men who use prostitutes or women who use gigolos? They have to be the saddest idiots of all, having to pay for it, and then having the audacity to think they are somehow morally better than the people they use. It takes two to tango.

1) I think this sort of thing is the tip of the iceberg into prostitution. As I've said numerous times here, this rinsing thing is wrong. Doing it to men is appalling but I can see how a pretty face and big boobs can make men empty their wallets. I just can't see women being so stupid or spell-bound by her. Women - lesbian I presume - just aren't that easily persuaded imo by a nice big pair of tits and a warm smile. There is something sinister going on with this and I don't buy this whole 'men and women reward me for my web cam' spiel. I can't believe this little strumpet is happy to accept gifting from women too knowing she has zero interest in them. She is not gay or bisexual so why do this? At least stick to men who may have a chance. She's conning women more than men and using the fact that she rinses women to make what she's doing somehow seem less sleazy.

2) I think the prostitutes are sadder than the 'clients'. Clients are often successful men just looking for extra fun with more money than sense. Allegedly Wayne Rooney used them. He's on Ł220K a week with an OK looking wife (not beautiful I admit) and a kid. He's not exactly some pathetic loner. Then there's his former team mate Christiano Ronaldo who apparently paid women for their *time*. Not exactly a desperado. Then you have the City executives and traders blowing their bonuses etc.

[Gillian-73]

Originally Posted by alex_front2

1) I think this sort of thing is the tip of the iceberg into prostitution. As I've said numerous times here, this rinsing thing is wrong. Doing it to men is appalling but I can see how a pretty face and big boobs can make men empty their wallets. I just can't see women being so stupid or spell-bound by her. Women - lesbian I presume - just aren't that easily persuaded imo by a nice big pair of tits and a warm smile. There is something sinister going on with this and I don't buy this whole 'men and women reward me for my web cam' spiel. I can't believe this little strumpet is happy to accept gifting from women too knowing she has zero interest in them. She is not gay or bisexual so why do this? At least stick to men who may have a chance. She's conning women more than men and using the fact that she rinses women to make what she's doing somehow seem less sleazy.

2) I think the prostitutes are sadder than the 'clients'. Clients are often successful men just looking for extra fun with more money than sense. Allegedly Wayne Rooney used them. He's on Ł220K a week with an OK looking wife (not beautiful I admit) and a kid. He's not exactly some pathetic loner. Then there's his former team mate Christiano Ronaldo who apparently paid women for their *time*. Not exactly a desperado. Then you have the City executives and traders blowing their bonuses etc.

Oh come on now, just because you don't think women are stupid enough to fall for it doesn't mean there isn't 100s of women out there who are that stupid, it certainly does not mean there must be something sinister going on. (plus it doesn't mean they're lesbians, maybe just lonely, i dunno).

[Gillian-73]

Originally Posted by alex_front2

1) I think this sort of thing is the tip of the iceberg into prostitution. As I've said numerous times here, this rinsing thing is wrong. Doing it to men is appalling but I can see how a pretty face and big boobs can make men empty their wallets. I just can't see women being so stupid or spell-bound by her. Women - lesbian I presume - just aren't that easily persuaded imo by a nice big pair of tits and a warm smile. There is something sinister going on with this and I don't buy this whole 'men and women reward me for my web cam' spiel. I can't believe this little strumpet is happy to accept gifting from women too knowing she has zero interest in them. She is not gay or bisexual so why do this? At least stick to men who may have a chance. She's conning women more than men and using the fact that she rinses women to make what she's doing somehow seem less sleazy.

2) I think the prostitutes are sadder than the 'clients'. Clients are often successful men just looking for extra fun with more money than sense. Allegedly Wayne Rooney used them. He's on Ł220K a week with an OK looking wife (not beautiful I admit) and a kid. He's not exactly some pathetic loner. Then there's his former team mate Christiano Ronaldo who apparently paid women for their *time*. Not exactly a desperado. Then you have the City executives and traders blowing their bonuses etc.

Surely that makes them clients sadder than the prostitute then. Succesful famous rich but still feel the need to pay for it!

[alex_front2]

Originally Posted by Gillian-73

Surely that makes them clients sadder than the prostitute then. Succesful famous rich but still feel the need to pay for it!

No because as 'ugly' as women may find Rooney, he could still have almost any girl he wanted but chose to pay for it. He didn't want hassle of an affair, just the sex. And sex how he wanted it. Not having to give a sh*t what the woman wants. He's in control. And when it's over like all clients he can throw his money down on bed and tell prostitute to ******* off.

I think the image of using a prostitute has changed. It seems like a laddish thing to do, guys boasting to their mates. Married men confiding to their single friends that they needed a sexual rush without their wives.

[Gillian-73]

Originally Posted by alex_front2

No because as 'ugly' as women may find Rooney, he could still have almost any girl he wanted but chose to pay for it. He didn't want hassle of an affair, just the sex. And sex how he wanted it. Not having to give a sh*t what the woman wants. He's in control. And when it's over like all clients he can throw his money down on bed and tell prostitute to ******* off.

I think the image of using a prostitute has changed. It seems like a laddish thing to do, guys boasting to their mates. Married men confiding to their single friends that they needed a sexual rush without their wives.

But how does it not make the men not as bad especially the married ones? Prostitutes make a living because men are prepared to pay for it. They don't need their arms twisting.

[Angus]

Originally Posted by Gillian-73

Surely that makes them clients sadder than the prostitute then. Succesful famous rich but still feel the need to pay for it!

BOOM!

[smeagol]

i think its disgusting shes nothing more than a ***** selling herself online for gifts but if any girls here would like to watch me shaking my bum for 5 mins it will cost you porshe and a curley wurley lol im like a budgie always cheap cheap

[GiRTh]

Originally Posted by smeagol

i think its disgusting shes nothing more than a ***** selling herself online for gifts but if any girls here would like to watch me shaking my bum for 5 mins it will cost you porshe and a curley wurley lol im like a budgie always cheap cheap

This is good point inside the joke. Why are the things on her 'wish list' so expensive? If she wasnt quite so expensive they maybe we could believe that she does this cuz she like it or gets a buzz or whatever but a 170k necklace is taking the p*ss.

[Gillian-73]

Originally Posted by GiRTh

This is good point inside the joke. Why are the things on her 'wish list' so expensive? If she wasnt quite so expensive they maybe we could believe that she does this cuz she like it or gets a buzz or whatever but a 170k necklace is taking the p*ss.

She caters for the rich (170k necklace) and the poor (Ł10 nail polish)

[smeagol]

Originally Posted by GiRTh

This is good point inside the joke. Why are the things on her 'wish list' so expensive? If she wasnt quite so expensive they maybe we could believe that she does this cuz she like it or gets a buzz or whatever but a 170k necklace is taking the p*ss.

well i guess you might as well list your most desired items down to something cheap always some sucker might buy it. always best to aim high .

id let someone tickle my balls and call me shirly for something that expensive lol

[billy123]

LOL @ the thought of a ***** being the one in control of the men that use them. They are just items to be consumed the money is compensation for them selling their self respect.

[alex_front2]

I also feel sorry for high end hookers. It's the same as being a 'low class' one. Being sexually subjugated by men. Being paid for your body and sexual services. Just because you get paid more doesn't really change the act. No such thing as a classy hooker.

[Gillian-73]

Originally Posted by alex_front2

I also feel sorry for high end hookers. It's the same as being a 'low class' one. Being sexually subjugated by men. Being paid for your body and sexual services. Just because you get paid more doesn't really change the act. No such thing as a classy hooker.

In that respect yes but they're not forced in to it due to abuse addiction homelessness etc like most girls on the streets, they could go and get a job work there way up so they're making the same sort of money but that's not easy where lying on your back is. More chances than your average working girl anyway.

[alex_front2]

I would love to know how many of danicas 'clients ' are female. Lesbians? Straight/ bi women who may be attracted to her? Married women giving hubby a cheap thrill? What do the women ask from Danica? Shocked women can be so grubby.