FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
The X Factor 2010 [S7] Series 7 of ITV's music reality show, The X Factor, won by Matt Cardle. Runner up was Rebecca Ferguson. Third was One Direction. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
11-11-2010, 02:45 PM | #1 | ||
|
|||
oh fack off
|
I'm not fussed either way, but it seems some obviously are - so I came up with this, and I think it'd be interesting
When it comes down to the Judges Vote in the Bottom Two, before any of the Judges vote - the act who received the fewest votes is revealed. This is the 'Publics Vote'. For example, say Wagner and Paije were in the Bottom Two - and Paije received the fewest votes - he would be the 'Publics Vote'. It would then be Paije 1 - 0 Wagner. The four Judges then make their decision as usual - but it means there is always a majority verdict, unless of course a Judge refuses to vote. And it would sort of make it fairer, as the publics decision really would be incorporated. Thoughts? |
||
Reply With Quote |
11-11-2010, 02:49 PM | #2 | |||
|
||||
I Love my brick
|
Nah, I don't think that would be good because knowing who actually had the fewest votes, first off could influence the judges decision and secondly if the act who got fewest public votes gets through you'd have people whining about that being unfair too
__________________
Spoiler: Last edited by Niamh.; 11-11-2010 at 02:49 PM. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
11-11-2010, 02:55 PM | #3 | ||
|
|||
oh fack off
|
Okay - flip it around then and have the 'Publics Decision' revealed last.
|
||
Reply With Quote |
11-11-2010, 02:58 PM | #4 | |||
|
||||
All hail the Moyesiah
|
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
11-11-2010, 03:00 PM | #5 | ||
|
|||
oh fack off
|
|
||
Reply With Quote |
11-11-2010, 03:04 PM | #6 | |||
|
||||
All hail the Moyesiah
|
Yeah, that'd make more sense, there's just the issue of it influencing the judges votes. It's not a bad idea in theory but it could never really work I don't think, the best option is to leave it how it is.
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
11-11-2010, 03:02 PM | #7 | |||
|
||||
I Love my brick
|
That's how it is now
__________________
Spoiler: |
|||
Reply With Quote |
11-11-2010, 03:41 PM | #8 | ||
|
|||
Truth hurts.
|
|
||
Reply With Quote |
11-11-2010, 03:44 PM | #9 | ||
|
|||
oh fack off
|
|
||
Reply With Quote |
11-11-2010, 03:50 PM | #10 | ||
|
|||
Truth hurts.
|
|
||
Reply With Quote |
11-11-2010, 03:08 PM | #11 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
I dont think this would work because people would still complain. I can just imagine it now.
Katie gets the least votes but the other act is sent home by the judges, everyone is still going to be "well its not fair she got the least votes" You cant win. Last edited by Jordan.; 11-11-2010 at 03:08 PM. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
11-11-2010, 03:09 PM | #12 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
If a judge refuses to vote, and the public vote then you are left with 4 votes. if it splits down the middle what happens then?
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
11-11-2010, 03:11 PM | #13 | ||
|
|||
oh fack off
|
Quote:
But I agree with Jordan on his last point, really - I guess you can't win, Complainers will always find something to complain about. |
||
Reply With Quote |
11-11-2010, 04:06 PM | #14 | |||
|
||||
Too glam to give a damn
|
Well you can't say they're complaining. You asked for our thoughts.
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
11-11-2010, 03:12 PM | #15 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
I have the perfect solution - all the judges have to vote, or they're fired on the spot, live. If a judge has two acts in the bottom two, they should choose last.
There. Are there any flaws with that?
__________________
"Seeing Is Believing" Last edited by _Seth; 11-11-2010 at 03:12 PM. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
11-11-2010, 03:20 PM | #16 | ||
|
|||
0_o
|
I like this idea better. It is afterall, what the judges are there for
__________________
Quote:
|
||
Reply With Quote |
11-11-2010, 03:34 PM | #17 | |||
|
||||
I Love my brick
|
Perfect.
__________________
Spoiler: |
|||
Reply With Quote |
11-11-2010, 03:39 PM | #18 | |||
|
||||
Against All Odds
|
Just get rid of Cheryl and bring in someone that will actually ****en vote
__________________
Spoiler: Sig stretching forum, fix it. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
11-11-2010, 03:40 PM | #19 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Can't get rid of Cheryl she is a great judge
__________________
"She was left for dead on the sands of Tatooine, as was I. But fate sometimes steps in to rescue the wretched." |
|||
Reply With Quote |
11-11-2010, 03:42 PM | #20 | |||
|
||||
Against All Odds
|
Are you being serious??? How the **** can she be a great judge when she wont even pick someone to leave
__________________
Spoiler: Sig stretching forum, fix it. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
11-11-2010, 03:44 PM | #21 | |||
|
||||
Not you, fat Jesus.
|
This is actually a good shout
__________________
♥ Cher Lloyd ♥ |
|||
Reply With Quote |
11-11-2010, 04:54 PM | #22 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
I think if they has just let Cheryl vote last like they usually do then it would have all blown over. Producers would have lost out because they only got Cheryl to vote second because they wanted Katie kept in. They havent helped Cheryl really, she got backlash for Gamu and the producers had alot to do with that, now this.
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
11-11-2010, 05:14 PM | #23 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
A judge with 2 acts in the bottom 2 should automatically lose their right to vote. Problem solved
|
||
Reply With Quote |
12-11-2010, 01:47 PM | #24 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
They should do a Fame Academy vote just kidding coz then if someone amazing was in the bottom two, some acts might vote to eliminate them to get rid of their competition
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
12-11-2010, 01:51 PM | #25 | |||
|
||||
Gimme Some Truth
|
that is one scary avatar tom, thought it was linda blair in the exorcist for a while
__________________
Last edited by nanaimo; 12-11-2010 at 01:51 PM. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
Reply |
|
|