[poppsywoppsy]

Originally Posted by saiwong

I knew beforhand that tempers are high and alot of people are angry at what Roxy did, and its totally understandable.

But from the summaries of the Roxy's appearence on Jeremy Vine that I've read, are totally different from what I saw.

When people are in a hightened and angry state, when watching the interview, their mind adjust what they see
to something that is more acceptable to them. Their mind filters out what they want and don't want to accept.
Some people never want to forgive Roxy, so their mind filters what they see occordingly. So in the
end what they experience is different from what actually occured.

Does this behaviour sound similar to what some other individual did ?

If you were to watch this interview in a months time when everyone has calmed down, you will see a totally differently interview.

I've had personal experience of someone close to me who's been through traumatic events, and the way Roxy is behaving is
very similar. People who have been through trauma can easily be 'triggered' by certain actions however passive and non-aggressive,
and consequent action can be hurtful. The hurt is real but not intentional and once the person has calmed down and see what they
have done they are apologetic.

Roxy sould listen to Amelia and get professional counseling to help manage trauma.

I am sorry but I just do not agree.

This behaviour has been going on for many years and has worked for Roxanne in the past, as so many have recently told.

Because it has worked, she had no compunction in carrying on doing it and by result, trying to ruin others careers.

Where was this abuse victim excuse relevant when she was bullying at school, long before anything had happened to her.

In fact, she had become so over confident, she had no problems in thinking she could hoodwink BB and the viewing public by targeting a person she had a previous beef with, right in front of cameras.

Where her lies had worked previously with no camera footage, she seriously miscalculated this time.

If it hadn't have been Ryan, it would have been Hardeep as she had already attempted to implicate him by her pool jump.

She should not be allowed to use DV as her get out clause because on many occasions her nasty behaviour was not primed by anything anywhere like violence, just her nasty vindictiveness when there was something she didn't care for.