[GoldHeart]

Originally Posted by Brother Leon

This is what makes the whole thing just uncomfortable tbh. It’s putting a dead person on trial through media with no real substantial evidence. So we either tarnish a dead man’s name or accuse potential sex abuse victims as liars. Just a mess of a situation.

For what it’s worth, I think it’s untrue and it’s not because it’s MJ. Too many stories just don’t add up with either previous testimony or simple facts and I’m just not going to brand someone a paedophile in that scenario.

Sensible post

Sadly the pop culture we live in now is jumping to conclusions and anyone can say they were abused today or 30 years ago without proof and it's taken as gospel , the media love bashing MJ alive & dead .

As soon as Safechuck mentioned the ridiculous "wedding ring " , the tabloids had a field day twisting old footage of MJ shopping in disguise . That footage is old and it only reamerged after the allegations . MJ was only in disguise so he doesn't get mobbed, he had a kid possibly Safechuck so that he could speak for MJ as people would recognise his voice, he even told a security guard at the time that he's incognito because of that . Not everything is sinister.

MJ was actually buying kids stuff , even if he bought jewellery doesn't mean it was a wedding ring for a Mock wedding . I hate how things get taken out of context & the media runs with it in a frenzy ! .