Quote:
Originally Posted by GoldHeart
It's as if we're not allowed to think MJ is innocent , and it's like we musn't question Wade & James despite the financial motivation & the dodgy backgrounds .
People call MJ "weird" & "manipulative" but what about Wade & James ? .Wade called himself "master of deception" , what kind of victim calls himself that?  .
And if MJ was alive today I doubt they would of come forward claiming they'd been abused . As MJ would fight them on it & like with the 93 & 03 cases they'd fall to pieces due to all the inconsistencies & contradictions.By suing the estate after the man is dead they can't get challenged by him as he's not around to defend himself.
I honestly hope their appeal gets rejected. They're using Leaving Neverland as some kind of messed up insurance to back up their graphic insane stories because they have NO REAL PROOF !! .
|
This is what makes the whole thing just uncomfortable tbh. It’s putting a dead person on trial through media with no real substantial evidence. So we either tarnish a dead man’s name or accuse potential sex abuse victims as liars. Just a mess of a situation.
For what it’s worth, I think it’s untrue and it’s not because it’s MJ. Too many stories just don’t add up with either previous testimony or simple facts and I’m just not going to brand someone a paedophile in that scenario.