Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack_
It's a valid opinion, nonetheless.
Yeah, there has to be limits. But text based jokes with serious worldwide events linked to them, which I'm confident many children wouldn't understand, compared to links + pictures of BB housemates etc topless are very different. An average child would not know who Josef Fritzl is, but they would know, and would see a picture of a topless woman.
Of course that's the case. But the idea of this argument is that I, and others, are arguing against it. It might not change things, but we're still entitled to express our opinions on it, and quite frankly, it seems a little silly to allow the things that I have mentioned, whilst censoring the other things that I have mentioned, as well as censoring words such as 'sh!t' and not 'wank', where is the logic in that?
|
Don't they censor the 'w' word - they should! Agree - no logic in that!
Threaded Mode