[Smithy]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

And let's be honest Smithy you were always going to say it was a **** article, your mind is closed on this one

But reading the article the writer is already bias by implying that the evidence given is nonsensical, he over exaggerates everything as if it’s impossible, whereas when you see the evidence in front of you, it’s clearly not.

And you may say that the show is bias, but the officers involved didn’t want to comment on the case and Kathleen deconstructs their case in an efficient manner.

I read it with an open mind but everything he said has already been proved or validated with scientific testing, that’s not being closed minded