[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

All I'm illustrating is that "They want money!" can be true without making "He did abuse them" necessarily false. Both can be true. The claim that they want money is repeatedly being used in an attempt to "prove" that the abuse allegations are false. It actually has no bearing... it doesn't matter if they have dollar signs in their eyes if the claims are still true.

But people have given opinions on both. Nobody's said they can't both be true. Doesn't change the fact they don't believe it to be true.

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

But people have given opinions on both. Nobody's said they can't both be true. Doesn't change the fact they don't believe it to be true.

Multiple people have used "AHA look they have a civil case on appeal" as supposed evidence that they are lying. More than once.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

Multiple people have used "AHA look they have a civil case on appeal" as supposed evidence that they are lying. More than once.

Have they? They've used that as "evidence" they're after money?

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Have they? They've used that as "evidence" they're after money?

Which is relevant because?

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

Which is relevant because?

Eh? You're the one that said it. I asked you, hence the question mark.

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Eh? You're the one that said it. I asked you, hence the question mark.

No, I asked you hence MY question mark

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

No, I asked you hence MY question mark

You said they are throwing the lawsuit around as evidence they are lying. They're using the lawsuit as "evidence" they're after money, which is a possible reason for them to tell these lies. Obviously.