[user104658]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

But people have given opinions on both. Nobody's said they can't both be true. Doesn't change the fact they don't believe it to be true.

Multiple people have used "AHA look they have a civil case on appeal" as supposed evidence that they are lying. More than once.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

Multiple people have used "AHA look they have a civil case on appeal" as supposed evidence that they are lying. More than once.

Have they? They've used that as "evidence" they're after money?

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Have they? They've used that as "evidence" they're after money?

Which is relevant because?

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

Which is relevant because?

Eh? You're the one that said it. I asked you, hence the question mark.

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Eh? You're the one that said it. I asked you, hence the question mark.

No, I asked you hence MY question mark

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

No, I asked you hence MY question mark

You said they are throwing the lawsuit around as evidence they are lying. They're using the lawsuit as "evidence" they're after money, which is a possible reason for them to tell these lies. Obviously.

[Christmas Lights]

They were also sweating like they were in the Sahara desert in the Oprah interview reeks of guilt ! .

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

You said they are throwing the lawsuit around as evidence they are lying. They're using the lawsuit as "evidence" they're after money, which is a possible reason for them to tell these lies. Obviously.

Well no, you're saying that money may possibly be a motive to lie which is true BUT the claim often pushed on this thread is more that "there's money involved so they are obviously lying" which is false.

The money and the judging the validity of the claims are largely unrelated to be honest. Especially in the US where seeking financial compensation when one feels "wronged" is baked into the legal culture.