[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

Which is relevant because?

Eh? You're the one that said it. I asked you, hence the question mark.

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Eh? You're the one that said it. I asked you, hence the question mark.

No, I asked you hence MY question mark

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

No, I asked you hence MY question mark

You said they are throwing the lawsuit around as evidence they are lying. They're using the lawsuit as "evidence" they're after money, which is a possible reason for them to tell these lies. Obviously.

[Christmas Lights]

They were also sweating like they were in the Sahara desert in the Oprah interview reeks of guilt ! .

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

You said they are throwing the lawsuit around as evidence they are lying. They're using the lawsuit as "evidence" they're after money, which is a possible reason for them to tell these lies. Obviously.

Well no, you're saying that money may possibly be a motive to lie which is true BUT the claim often pushed on this thread is more that "there's money involved so they are obviously lying" which is false.

The money and the judging the validity of the claims are largely unrelated to be honest. Especially in the US where seeking financial compensation when one feels "wronged" is baked into the legal culture.

[bots]

Lets look at the Monica situation. She clearly kept the stained dress to use for monetary gain later. She intended to go for the money shot right from the start. However, no matter her greed, President Clinton did spunk over her dress, and it showed him to be an out and out liar.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

Well no, you're saying that money may possibly be a motive to lie which is true BUT the claim often pushed on this thread is more that "there's money involved so they are obviously lying" which is false.

The money and the judging the validity of the claims are largely unrelated to be honest. Especially in the US where seeking financial compensation when one feels "wronged" is baked into the legal culture.

I never said it hasn't been said in this thread.

I was referring more to the specific members you were referring to.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

Well no, you're saying that money may possibly be a motive to lie which is true BUT the claim often pushed on this thread is more that "there's money involved so they are obviously lying" which is false.

The money and the judging the validity of the claims are largely unrelated to be honest. Especially in the US where seeking financial compensation when one feels "wronged" is baked into the legal culture.

Except it can't be, because if they are lying, then money is an obvious motive for that lie.