[AnnieK]

I think the difference in the debates is there really isnt that much to talk about with Andrew. I would not, at this stage, call him a paedophile as nothing has been proven. His lack of cooperation and absolute car crash of an interview don't prove his guilt....what is more telling is the Queens decision to basically sack him....he has something dubious at best to hide...criminal at worst. Everyone knows he stayed with Epstein so he moved in unsavoury circles, the rest currently is speculation.

With Harry and Meghan, its more opinion and differing opinions so will be debated more. As Livia (I think) alluded to is the GBP all feel protective of Harry from seeing him lose his mother and so people have strong opinions. Its a much more palatable debate than wondering if a Prince sexually abused people.....I think people are worried that if they think he is innocent and it comes out he isn't, they will be seen as defending a paedophile.

It's much easier to debate why you like or don't like a girl who has "stolen" our favourite young prince