[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

Odd thing to say this dezzy, the vessel isn't the issue is it?
Effectively who has the child has no baring on the opinion as to what is right or wrong for the foetus imo.

The point is that the pro-life movement is less about being pro-life and more about controlling women's rights to choose. Pro-lifers stop caring after a baby is born, they don't care if the parents are ill equipped to be parents or if the baby is raised in homes and is discarded by the system.

If men were the ones who gave birth, the whole pro-life/pro-choice debate would look entirely different (IE, it would be non-existent).

It has no bearing on the discussion of when life begins, but it has bearing on the pro-life/choice discussion.

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

The point is that the pro-life movement is less about being pro-life and more about controlling women's rights to choose. Pro-lifers stop caring after a baby is born, they don't care if the parents are ill equipped to be parents or if the baby is raised in homes and is discarded by the system.

If men were the ones who gave birth, the whole pro-life/pro-choice debate would look entirely different (IE, it would be non-existent).

It has no bearing on the discussion of when life begins, but it has bearing on the pro-life/choice discussion.

If pro lifers were all men I'd agree but they aren't, however I agree with you in principle if you are pro life you need to be pro child too and ensure all kids are well cared for once here.