Quote:
Originally Posted by jet
Can you point out the 'lies and dodgy motives' that you attribute to me?
I said they had trademarked the name for monetary purposes, which they had. They subsequently discovered that its use was forbidden by the Institution. Harry should have known this, but well, he’s Harry….and when Meghan sniffs dollar signs she just blunders ahead regardless.
|
I was just quoting your post.
However...
You go back to making the same claim about them. You have no idea about the ins or outs of anything. Pretty sure all of their expensive trademark lawyers would have known about the information you're pretending they had no idea about.
Seems a bit dodgy in motive to me, but whaddo I know?