Quote:
Originally Posted by Soldier Boy
This part is correct the plan is written on sugar paper and will dissolve as soon as the election is over, either way.
Just nonsense, when there's talk of increasing defense spending it's for equipment, R&D and increased recruitment of professionals.
Bombs, missiles, planes, boats, pilots, engineers. Not feet in boots.
The UK has no need of a militia because we're an island - if enemy combatants are on the ground on UK soil the war is OVER. This was true in WW2 and it's true today.
A modern military like the UK's has no use for barely trained grunts with a rifle in hand. That's just not modern warfare. One attack helicopter is worth thousands of conscripts. War is won by $$$ not numbers.
If you want proof you need ONLY look at Ukraine, where Russian numbers have been bashing up against Western money and resources for well over a year now and making little progress. Ukraine is vastly outnumbered. It's not because of teenagers with peashooters it's because of US/Europe funded and supplied drones, ammunition and tech.
|
i don't think you understand our commitment to NATO. I'm not suggesting there will be an invasion on our home soil, but there could easily be one in any of the NATO countries bordering Russia. Who do you think guards and defends those borders? We will, as part of NATO, that's the whole point of it
Russian numbers aren't even an issue yet. They haven't done a proper mobilisation yet.
The biggest issue any country has is replenishing ammo, armour and aircraft and Russia have converted over to a war economy. Unless we move to a similar footing, we will get beaten and the first step of that is getting people trained and prepared. Not just to fight on the front line, but to up our game in intelligence and cyber warfare., drone technology etc etc etc
Preparation for war is as much a state of mind as anything else