[Glenn.]

Originally Posted by Kate!

Oh look! You clearly saw that post. So I was right about you spouting garbage about not seeing anything I wrote.

Back on topic...why put them through screening then even when it's only a what if? Or putting them on medication as a preventative when they might never need it, eg if heart disease is in their DNA.

I don't agree with it. And don't tell me in a patronising fashion to calm down. Watch how you speak to people, it's damm rude. I was perfectly calm and reasoned in my post. You calm down instead.

I can still see ignored posts when I want to, and I decide if or when I bother responding. It’s called being in control, you should try it sometime.

And screening? It’s about knowing, not forcing treatments. Information doesn’t ‘traumatise’ a child, but ignorance sure can. Not that I expect you to comprehend the difference.

Anyway, you stay ‘calm and reasoned’ over there. The rest of us will stick with common sense and leave the pearl‑clutching to you.