FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#11 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
I am personally 50/50 on this. On a very surface level, it seems like a good thing:
It's important to consider that they will only be looking for conditions that: - are reliably detectable, - would impact quality of life if left undetected, - have proven improved outcome when intervention has been put in place before symptoms show - have treatment available. However this isn't perfect - on a totally basic level, this could effect things like travel insurance from birth, even if the symptoms aren;'t showing and could not effect someone for decades to come. There is also the very real threat of data-selling, potentially. It would need to have an incredibly tight security around it. Having said all that, I would be lying if I said I trusted any Government at all, and particularly with health issues. There was something extremely weird about the way in which governments manufactured and manipulated the fear and control during covid pandemic which will forever make me look at them suspiciously. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
|
|