[Gavin]

- They weren't available when they wrote yesterday's article

Nonsense. The ratings were available for all channels from 9:30am (like always), and they could have included the rating in there but didn't. Look at all their other articles, which were written days after the ratings were released, and none of them mention +1.

- But they do, if availabile , report them.

As noted above, they are available from their data service Attentional. But they choose not to use them.

- No source is unbiased and 406,100 is not insignificant

Less biased than Channel 4. And if you read my post I said "usually". 406,100 - like I said in my PM - will have viewers who are watchign again. So that's why it's unreliable to add the rating onto the main channel rating.