[Tom]

Originally Posted by Judas Iscariot

See this just goes around in circles as ultimately your a slave to the theory .

So this time my question is : Which definition says God is immaterial? I wasn't aware the big fella had a definition. You simply can't prove he is not material. Your right though, you can't prove he is material either.

The topic titles argument is becoming more and more banal as we go along.

Definitions that I've worked from in the past generally point in the same direction. Some theodicies etc.

I think to properly look at the two, you need to isolate them both because they just end up falling back on one another and you get nowhere. Reminds me of when you're a kid and you call someone something, only for them to reply "I know you are so what am I?" Religion essentially opens up a whole minefield for philosophy so its hard to argue when religion is involved, and the dreaded "God works in mysterious ways".

To sum up a Facebook group, Christianity: One womans lie about having an affair that got out of hand.