[In the Drunk Tank]

Originally Posted by Jack_

Two months. Not two weeks.

You are still missing the point. It's the principle. He is effectively working for free. He has worked for two months and received no pay.

Again - would you [or anyone else] agree to that?

If it happened to me I would be a bit annoyed, of course. But he's someone who has plenty of money, enough to spare and having to wait a bit for a couple of delayed cheques is hardly the biggest disaster. Isnt it at the end of each month he gets paid? In which case he was paid at the end of July, not in August and September isnt over yet so he's probably blowing it out of proportion. I'm not going to sympathise with him purely out of principle when, in all honesty, this probably wont have a detrimental effect on his finances at all. If it was a working man sturggling to pay the bills then I would have all the sympathy in the world but when he has plenty of money to survive without, then the "prinicple" is not as much of a concern. He should remember how lucky he is to be so well-off before making such an issue of this.

And regardless of whether he thinks he has been unfairly treated, he has no right to go off on one live on air. The listeners dont want to hear that, and I doubt very much that most of them give a damn over the minor woes of that tit.