[tate]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

That's a rubbish way to look at things though, if Katie wasn't there it'd be someone else who would be made into the villain. The tabloids lie a disgusting amount. There's hardly ever an ounce of truth within them.

You can't really say you don't believe in what the tabloids say and the say there's no smoke without fire, that's hypocritical.

i disagree Dezzy, the tabloids tend to exagerate stories and often take things in a different context however there is almost always a basis to go on so to suggest that every story is untrue is ridiculous, there would be lawsuits galore if that were the case and the press complaints commision crawling all over them

Although you are correct, if it wasnt katie it would be someone else however i still stand by the no smoke no fire comment i made

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by tate

i disagree Dezzy, the tabloids tend to exagerate stories and often take things in a different context however there is almost always a basis to go on so to suggest that every story is untrue is ridiculous, there would be lawsuits galore if that were the case and the press complaints commision crawling all over them

Although you are correct, if it wasnt katie it would be someone else however i still stand by the no smoke no fire comment i made

There wouldn't actually because most tabloids use 'unnamed sources' or 'insiders', if you look at most of the quotes in those articles the language and style is always similar because hardly any 'insiders' are real. It's just a way for the media to print BS as due to the freedom of the press they don't have to give up their sources so it's tricky to prove most of it wrong. They print lies, but they almost always make sure they're covered by this first.