Quote:
Originally Posted by GiRTh
Her silence speaks volumes cuz her fans act like the assault was justified. If that was true then surely Cheryl would have said so.
Cheryl was found guilty and the girl was not charged I dont see self defence.
|
No it doesn't, it the silence just says that Cheryl takes responsibility for it. It doesn't justify it but it means nothing more. Cheryl did say to the courts it was in self defence but because Cheryl didn't have a scratch that claim was thrown out the window but it still doesn't mean anything. As I said, 2 sides to every story. I get the impression Cheryl would just rather it was forgotten rather than dragging up a dead horse and at the time it was damage limitation to Girls Aloud who had only been going for a month. Dragging it out would have made matters much worse.
There are multiple reasons for no statements made, the most obvious being she or her PR team didn't see the point.
Threaded Mode